From a broad perspective, in the current state of affairs we face, in which knowledge become an integral part of the world. It is not far-fetched to presume that teachers play a significant part in the society. I am concur with the idea that in the past people appreciated and praised teachers more than now. I feel this way for three main reasons which I will explore in the following paragraph.
First and foremost, the emergence of technology was a great revolution and it has caused a sweeping change in people's attitude. Most students tent to gain information and knowledge from internet and they are not desire to allocate their time to listening in class. Actually internet enable people to enhance their understanding of diverse subjects. My own experience demonstrates this concept. When I was in high school, I did not participate in class and did not care about my teacher as I had access any kind of information on the internet. So, I could solve my problems in subjects.
Moreover, in an old time, we had a great deal of experienced and skilled educators. But at the present time, most of teachers are extremely young and have not adequate knowledge. So, they squander the time of class and talk about irrelevant topics including politics and economy. So, people do not prefer to admire and appreciate them.
Thirdly,in the past educators evaluated students by their scores and other activities and they did not fail students deliberately. Because they believed that children tried their best in order to get good scores. But at the current time, youngsters have been adversely affected by teacher's behavior. I mean, we can bribe teachers to pass us in the exam. Actually they do not behave toward students fairly
In conclusion, these days I really believe that educators are not valued as good as past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'concurred'.
Suggestion: concurred
...a significant part in the society. I am concur with the idea that in the past people a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the teachers') or simply say ''most teachers''.
Suggestion: most of the teachers; most teachers
...led educators. But at the present time, most of teachers are extremely young and have not adequa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
... to admire and appreciate them. Thirdly,in the past educators evaluated students b...
^^^
Line 4, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hey did not fail students deliberately. Because they believed that children tried their...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 281, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ngsters have been adversely affected by teachers behavior. I mean, we can bribe teachers...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, moreover, really, so, third, thirdly, i feel, i mean, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 309.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89644012945 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77227489827 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576051779935 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7463108856 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6315789474 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2631578947 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156824375804 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433178461528 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501247190515 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853192812522 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398512675589 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.