Being honest in personal and professional life is an essential characteristic which contributes to a long-lasting relationship. Some people believe that always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relations between individuals. Others, on the other hand, hold the opposite view and make the notion that being honest does not always result in outcomes favourable to us and presumably brings about the end of relationship whether personal or professional. I personally am of the opinion that the latter carries more weight. There are some certain cases in which we have to circumvent telling the truth, which will be aruged in the following essay.
To start with, even now and then any individual has faced some unique and critical circumstances which telling the truth could hurt his or her close friend, parent or partner. If one's wife is diagnosed with a tumour, presumably the physician first lets the husband to know about this serious disorder. Consequently, the physician would suggest that it is the husband's decision to tell his wife about this horrible news. Telling the truth in this case is not an effective and correct decision as it probably brings about more stress and pressure on the patient, discouraging her to start the treatment. If the physician tells her about the side-effects of the treatment, supposedly, she even might not try to undergo the treatment. On the other hand, hiding the reality about her illness and convincing her that she has been diagnosed by a virus which 1 out of 10 people has been affected by, does go a long way towards her well-being. Showing the treatment success rate of patients who get the same disease will also encourage her to undergo a treatment. As this example has showed, sometimes telling white lies not only hinders the breaking down of a relationship but also may save a life.
In addition, always telling the truth might have some adverse effects in our relationships with our colleagues. Consider a case when two colleagues have spoken with each other about the corrupt management system about which one of them was heard from other people. If one of these two staff goes to the manager and tells all the gossip about the corruption, the other one will face significant problems which might even cost him or her job. Furthermore, when an employee speaks with a senior colleague, he or she should be careful when talking about the technical problems. This is a mindful and mature decision to always talk in a manner which shows tactfulness towards the senior colleagues or the manager. Telling the exact truth that their work is worthless or that they do not have deep knowledge of some special projects would have some detrimental impact on the work progress.
In conclusion, although being honest is a key characteristic which we should consider in our personal and professional relationships, it does not mean to stick to it always. There are some cases in which it is recommendable to circumvent telling the truth somehow to prevent the upcoming consequences which might end our relationships.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...her close friend, parent or partner. If ones wife is diagnosed with a tumour, presum...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1008, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate of patients who get the same disease will also encourage her to undergo a tr...
^^
Line 3, column 1044, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ease will also encourage her to undergo a treatment. As this example has showed,...
^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...nships, it does not mean to stick to it always. There are some cases in which it is re...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, so, then, well, in addition, in conclusion, talking about, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2581.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 514.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02140077821 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85478044372 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498054474708 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 775.8 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.015124688 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.904761905 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4761904762 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90476190476 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142673786138 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501390976711 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587607076258 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901309035901 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489710162221 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.