TPO 12 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

TPO-12 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Needless to say, today more students attend the colleges than the past. This brings us a highly controversial question surrounding the university courses whether it is advantageous to young people to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects or not. I believe that students will benefit more if they specialize in a particular topic. The reasons behind this standpoint related to the future work, as well as the difficulty of subjects which I will elaborate on them in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, studying one specific subject is beneficial to the future career. In other words, nowadays, there are a lot of companies asking their job candidates to demonstrate a good understanding of a special subject area. Therefore, if young people become an expert in one specific subject, it is likely that they will be able to find a job in the future. My own experience provides an illuminating insight into this fact. Recently, I finished my bachelor degree in mechanical engineering at a recognized university and I immediately applied for a job vacancy in a big manufacturing company. The company's administrations asked me to show a good experience in a particular area, namely mechanic of material. I had good ability in this subject area, as I had several publications concerning the mechanic of material. Hence, I was employed as a senior engineer in the company. However, other applicants applying for the job position did not have a good skill in the aforementioned subject, and thus they were rejected. Not only did they employed in the manufacturing firm but also they could not find any employee in other industrial section. Consequently, deep knowledge in a special subject is beneficial for people' future profession since they can find an employee better.
The second point worth discussing related to the difficulty of the subject. In fact, reading several textbooks that do not focus on a particular topic is significantly difficult than reading one textbook related to one topic. Alternatively stated, it is difficult to read several books and prepare for the university examinations. One example will suffice to illustrate this point. When I was a university student, all of my friends were interested in choosing several elective courses which were not concentrated in a special subject. Nevertheless, I selected some courses connecting to one other and completing one other data. Thus, I was able to read a few books in order to prepare for exams, whereas my friend must read page by page of each book for the sake of taking tests. I heard that they had trouble finishing each book. They said me that they had not known the difficulty of reading several books before they chose courses. As a result of this, students will get in trouble if they select courses with diverse subjects.
In conclusion, according to above-mentioned factor, I contend that the good knowledge in one subject has benefits of finding a profession in the future and studying easier.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 837, Rule ID: SAY_TELL[2]
Message: 'Say' cannot be followed by a direct personal object. Did you mean 'told'?
Suggestion: told
...y had trouble finishing each book. They said me that they had not known the difficul...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, in other words, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2500.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 493.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07099391481 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03579767803 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490872210953 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 803.7 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2722442903 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1538461538 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9615384615 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.96153846154 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190166758786 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540091025348 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558189176652 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122221403165 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385459553031 0.0645574589148 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.