Travel is the best way to relieve stress and also visit different place in other counteris. Many people think that traveling solely is better than to travel in a group. However, I believe that having a trip with the group by a tour guide has more benefit due to the having entertainment and easier access to find the historical place.
Firstly, a tour guide helps the group of people who they have eager to visit new places. During my journey to Paris, I booked a tour for sightseeing. When I had joined the tour, I met a girl who was from my country and I started to speak with her. So, it was such a pleasure to meet her and other member of groups. While we were on our way to the museum, I also spoke with the tour guide and ask her about the Louvre musuem. Therefore, I gained a lot of information about the art and sculpture in the museum.
Second, Visiting the new place is a way to know the culture and history of other country although finding the location of each place require an expert guide to show us. As for me, the tour guide showed me the various place in Paris including a historical church in the countryside, the palace of Versai and the musuem of Louvre. In addition, She invited us to the traditional restaurant which they cooked the delicious chicken and special french cheese. Hence, I could visit several fascinating and intersting place with her guide.
To conclude, the tour guide can help us to have the enjoyable trip and the convenience way to visit the variety of place which is not familair with us and they provide the brief summary for each part. Because of these reasons, It makes our travel unforegettable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 300.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50333333333 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47561215774 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543333333333 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 618.680645161 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1021525629 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0666666667 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130184937869 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477405565512 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331733263206 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882035834399 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371572926148 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.