Nowadays, there are many sources for news. People have many options to get information, but choosing the right source is important. Some people prefer to get information through a channel, on the other hand some people think otherwise. Both ways have some advantages and disadvantages. I personally prefer to read all news in a one newspaper instead of variety of papers from different resources.
First and foremost, many resources are filled by fake news. Authors of those news are some business mans, who wants to increase the benefit for their commercial channel or newspaper. People who want to trust these kinds of news would be disappointed after a while, because although those news are attractive, they are not true in most parts. For example, two different news’s resources can report different news by the same topic. This happened couple of years ago in my home country, Iran. I was reading one of those fake news and I started to yell after seconds, because I read an earthquake is coming for Tehran. Indeed, there is a possibility for earthquake in Tehran, but they wrote that it is happening now and they mentioned some signs for that phenomenal. After that I decided to just read some valid news instead of reading some random newspaper.
Second of all, reading a same resource will help people to avoid of getting confused. Some adults prefer to read many news in many sources. After a while, they are confused by many contrasts. They do not know which one is the right one, so they cannot decide for their future, For instance, imagine a person, who wants to buy a house in the close future. When he read a news about an increase in interest rate, he/she would be freak. Undoubtedly, there are other resources, which predict a low interest rate for the future, so that person cannot decide between these much varieties.
Last but not least, people can focus on subject instead of focusing on resource. Psychologically, people are trying to find the best answer to their questions, so they try to find out which news is true and which one is not. In this case, they will lose their focus, because they cannot just read the topic and search a little bit. They also need to recognize a real news. Therefore, finding a valid source would be the best idea in this situation, because after one time, each person can trust them and be comfortable with their news. As an illustration, data analysts in Irvine University started to demonstrate some cause of do not having focus during reading or listening to a news and surprisingly, they found out that the most effective way to increase the focus in this situation is increasing trust.
To sum up, each person have some preferences in choosing a resource for his/her information, but the best way to increase the efficiency is getting data from a popular and valid source of news.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this news' or 'those newses'?
Suggestion: this news; those newses
...ces are filled by fake news. Authors of those news are some business mans, who wants to in...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this news' or 'those newses'?
Suggestion: this news; those newses
...pointed after a while, because although those news are attractive, they are not true in mo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 770, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ntioned some signs for that phenomenal. After that I decided to just read some valid ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...ng confused. Some adults prefer to read many news in many sources. After a while, th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun news seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much news', 'a good deal of news'.
Suggestion: much news; a good deal of news
...ng confused. Some adults prefer to read many news in many sources. After a while, they ar...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...house in the close future. When he read a news about an increase in interest rate, he/...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 568, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...that person cannot decide between these much varieties. Last but not least, peop...
^^^^
Line 7, column 321, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...cannot just read the topic and search a little bit. They also need to recognize a real new...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 361, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'real news'.
Suggestion: real news
...little bit. They also need to recognize a real news. Therefore, finding a valid source woul...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2369.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 492.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81504065041 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60738929097 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465447154472 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 742.5 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.994623655914 302% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2114376858 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1153846154 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11538461538 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132568830855 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467438767839 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368983066064 0.0737576698707 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902905342652 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229375519684 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.