In this competitive world market, efficiency is always regarded as the most crucial factor to survive among numerous companies. But it is quite a controversial topic when we ask people what efficiency means. Some people insist that efficiency is speed, while others argue that it means accuracy. From my standpoint, I think we should better work slowly to make sure that everything is correct. The reasons are as following.
Firstly, when you do the job very quickly, you are more possible to make mistakes as well. There are many vivid cases that testify that we may spend much more time to resolve the mistake. The only result is that we will fail to finish the work on time. However, if we do the work prudently, we spend less time to inspect the whole work, which means more efficient. For instance, when I was a student in my high school, we often had math exams. My tactic was to check my calculation after every step and then begin to answer the next question. Although it cost me more time answering the same question than other students, I avoided most silly mistakes. I even had some extra time to figure out the additional question because I did not need to review my answers. When I saw some students being so upset about their calculation errors, I knew I had the right tactic.
Moreover, most bosses appreciate employees who are steady. When your boss gives you a task, he/she often tells you the deadline as well. It is apparent that the boss only wants the best result; however, he/she barely cares how you do the work. Therefore, we do not need to finish our work as quickly as possible. What we should do is to hand in the best result. Thus it is more efficient to guarantee the accuracy. When I did my internship in a financial leasing company, my boss told me on the very first day that she could not endure any mistake. In other words, it was not her responsibility to revise my work. Consequently, I did my work extremely carefully. I even checked the pages when I printed some documents to affirm that no page is missed. On the last day of my internship, she told me that she trusted my work due to the constant high quality and I should keep this advantage in my future career.
Last but not the least, we will get more opportunities to cooperate with our colleagues if we make few mistake. A good cooperation is based on trust. If we always make some mistakes, then no one is willing to bear the risk with us. For instance, once I conducted an experiment with my friend. I was surprised that he finished his part of job two days before the deadline which made me unconfident of my capacity at one time. However, when I read his report, I was totally disappointed in him as he had ignored many important factors. He left me a bad impression that he was merely a free-rider. Since then, I never cooperate with him.
In conclusion, we should sacrifice time to increase the accuracy as it is a positive recycle. When we make fewer mistakes, we will be more confident of our work, which in turn leads to a faster speed. And that is what means efficiency。
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...hould do is to hand in the best result. Thus it is more efficient to guarantee the a...
^^^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun mistake seems to be countable; consider using: 'few mistakes'.
Suggestion: few mistakes
...ooperate with our colleagues if we make few mistake. A good cooperation is based on trust. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.0286738351 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 101.0 43.0788530466 234% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2530.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 559.0 407.700716846 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5259391771 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86242540663 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5954914725 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502683363148 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 805.5 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 24.0 9.59856630824 250% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 12.0 3.51792114695 341% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 36.0 20.6003584229 175% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3645926641 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.2777777778 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5277777778 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182223094817 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048301056832 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565530890065 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104873502475 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162772305332 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 11.7677419355 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.