TPO-29- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's progressive world, educators play a pivotal role in forming a successful society because they not only help distribute the moral values to next generation but also teach youngsters how to create a better world for their future. When it comes to allocating more budget for a university professor, controversy surrounds the issue of whether it should be spent on other priorities or not. I am of the opinion that schools should spend their budget mainly on their students than their professors, and the following explanation will further elaborate on my perspective.
Firstly, universities ought to allot their budget on funding their genius students if they want to improve their education qualities. Since there is a huge competition outside the school to absorb more gifted students, universities can stimulate parents to send their kids to their institution if they provide them a scholarship. In fact, there is a straight relationship between talented students and the quality of the education because they can digest their lessons faster than regular students. Hence, it does not matter either their professors are instructors or well-paid enough because they will eventually find their way to the success on their own. Take my cousin for instance. He is studying in a major of mechanical engineering, and their university due to his talent offered him a full fund for entire educational terms.
Also, as most international students cannot find a proper part-time job to earn enough money to run their school and social life, universities should solve this financial problem. As a matter of fact, since most governments limit the working hours of international students, they have difficulty adapting to their new life. In this regard, universities ought to prepare an opportunity for these students to manage their problems by giving yearly loans and instead of paying their loans, students can be required to work at the university after graduation. Therefore, instead of giving this amount to college professors, they can facilitate the life of their students by loans. Not only would their students study hard to enhance their performance but also they will guarantee their future job.
Paradoxically, providing a better financial situation for the university professors will add to their inclination to study hard to offer better quality for their students. In essence, nowadays, teachers are not satisfied enough mostly due to their low salaries. Thus, they may lose their concentration because of their daily problems, and this will consequently affect their studying performance.
In sum, although there are some justifications by one who argues that university lecturers should get enough money yo teach better, I am pretty convinced that there some other priorities for schools to be considered. Universities should allocate their budget mostly on their students because talented students can contribute more than a satisfied professor, and also some international students need help adjust to their new life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 6, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd for entire educational terms. Also, as most international students cannot fi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in fact, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2564.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38655462185 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90984815726 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516806722689 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 783.0 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.7047794176 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.947368421 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0526315789 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63157894737 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109281602509 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048988892367 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390346160362 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830003741914 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229236639782 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.