Quality of education at university is one of important parts of our live. Well-educated people can obtain better opportiunities. It means that they usually can make more money. Some people believe that to improve the quality of education, universiries should spend more money on salaries for university professors; other people disagree. In my view, it is better to universities spend more money on other factor that cuntribute to improve the quality of education which are elaborated in the two following paragraphs.
First, spending more money on equipments of laboratories improve the qaulity of education. It is very obvious that equipment laboratoris in top ten universities help to improve the quality of education. These students have more equipments, and so they can easily learn concepts. For example, when I was in university, I studied computer engineering. My field was Artificial Intelligence. At the first year of my master, the university did not have a Artificial Intelligence Lab. So for practical courses we had to go to another university, where was very away. We spent much time to got there. But in the second year of my master, the universityd establishe a new well-equiept laberatory. It had two effects. We did not had to spent considerable time to got the other university. Moreover, it was our university library and we could use it more. So we learnt more things than it was. As you can see, a well equiept labotory has a significant role in learning.
Second, decreasing the tution fees improve the quality of education. Because of hike tution fee in universities studtents had to work. It means that students had to spent some of their time on working instead of studing or reaserching. For example, when I was in university, studying master's degree. I had to work to earn living espenses and tution fees. In fact, I had a part-time job. Sometimes I missed some classes because I had to go to work. Missing some classes result in failin in that course. In the next semsester, I had to take it again. As you can see, the hike tution fee has a neative impact on my learning.
To sum up, to improve the quality of education, universities should not spend more money on salaries for university professors. Not only should they spend more money on their laboratoris, but they also should decrease tution fee. Students should checked these two factor befor selecting a university, where they atend to study there.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 448, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... my master, the university did not have a Artificial Intelligence Lab. So for pra...
^
Line 2, column 720, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...eratory. It had two effects. We did not had to spent considerable time to got the o...
^^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... fees improve the quality of education. Because of hike tution fee in universities stud...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, well, for example, in fact, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2032.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95609756098 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97237328988 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458536585366 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 671.4 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Interrogative: 4.0 0.994623655914 402% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.6003584229 155% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6653082166 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.5 100.406767564 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.8125 20.6045352989 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90625 5.45110844103 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 18.0 4.88709677419 368% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208029128444 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557131707722 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875388317219 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154648522959 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830323848701 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 58.1214874552 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.6 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.