I agree with the idea that students tend to be more efficient if they were asked to work together. And I learned this lesson from my experience and observations.
First of all, when working as a team, a project would usually be divided into multiple tasks. In this case, each member would only take charge of a small portion of the job. Individuals could learn how to cooperate, which is a crucial skill in their career, effectively and efficiently. For example, when I was assigned to design an energy-saving villa with my partners, we divided this project into several tasks.
Besides this, as a group, students would always encourage each other to finish his job. If one could do his project alone, it is very likely that he may be procrastinating to the last minute. However, as a team, members have a common goal which is to finish the task on time. So they would encourage their partners to get motivated as planned and to finish each task before the deadline. From this, one could alway learn to make a schedule and finish them on time.
Another advantage of group working is that members could always find a person to talk. Communication is crucial in the study. If a student came across some problems he could not solve by oneself, it is always good to ask his team members. Or if they are stock and couldn't get a creative idea they want, a brainstorm within the group could easily solve the problem. After all, human beings are not perfect. No matter how smart you are, you will always find something that you can learn from others.
As the factors mentioned above, I think that those students who got the group assignment works could learn more things than their peers who had to solve the problem alone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... team members. Or if they are stock and couldnt get a creative idea they want, a brains...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mething that you can learn from others. As the factors mentioned above, I think ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, may, so, after all, for example, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 306.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65359477124 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45332349875 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562091503268 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6247700924 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1111111111 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234163341779 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672822957746 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660002872201 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142973589315 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558642267317 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.