It is acknowledged that education are essential in the continuing development of every country. However, opinions are divided when it comes to which one should be invested more funds, primary education or higher education? Though primary education plays a key role in the healthy growth of the kids, I am convinced that more money should be spend on universities. My reasons are as follows.
For one thing, compared to the education of very young children, universities require more money to educate the students. Majoring in specified subjects, students in the college are occupied in learning quite advanced knowledge. They not only have to buy quantities of textbooks, but also they need to do some research training in the lab, both of which cost a fortune. Take myself for example. As a medical student, I am supposed to take at least 10 courses in one semester such as Chinese medicine, biochemistry, cellular biology and so on. The expense of buying all the required books adds up to 6,000 dollars. Afterwards, I have to make the ends meet by doing part-time job for half a year. In addition, the mouse and chemicals needed in experiments also cost a lot. By contrast, less are needed with regard to a young kid in primary school. A few pencils and a sheet of paper, plus some simple devices used in demonstration experiment, can readily meet their needs. Therefore, it is safe to say that education in universities are more needy in money than the educations of very young children.
For another, money spent on universities will lead to some new advancement in science, which can be turned into profits of the whole country. Let suppose that the department of computer science in a university is funded. Then they may be able to upgrade their old-fashioned devices, and as a result, their experiments involved with computer are more likely to achieve some accomplishment. For instance, a new kind of computer will come out, with a higher computing speed and less electricity consumption. In this way, more energy are saved and a greater efficiency is guaranteed, booming the economy of all industries.
Some people may argue that spending money on the education of younger children can contribute to their healthy growth. Then, by the time they become adults, they will be highly qualified labors of this country, which is a fabulous aid in the prosperity of national economy. This idea sounds plausible at the first glance. Regretfully, we can find the flaws in it after careful examination. Can the education of younger children certainly be highly boosted with more funds? The answer is obvious, no. Admittedly, more money means that schools are able to hire teachers who are more eligible and can supply our children with a better education. But how can the more qualified teachers be available if there are not enough qualified moral school graduates due to the little money spent on universities? Thus, money spent on universities are relatively more crucial.
To sum it up, it is more important to spend money on universities rather than education of the younger children. Only when more money are spent on the universities can our country acquire a successful development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 342, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spent'?
Suggestion: spent
... am convinced that more money should be spend on universities. My reasons are as foll...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, such as, as a result, for one thing, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2671.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 533.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01125703565 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87243803172 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521575984991 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 855.9 618.680645161 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3992874321 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1612903226 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1935483871 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58064516129 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 17.0 4.88709677419 348% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298434767783 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754313581317 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805414124224 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1763491917 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472952518833 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.