Every one has their own preferred way of working on their duties. I certainly believe that workers would be more satisfied if they have several types of tasks to do, rather than doing the same tasks over and over again. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, the variety in tasks would reduce the routine and boring, which are killer factors in any job. Workers will start not to like to show up at work, and this would affect the company terribly. Whenever the members of any company would become low motivated, this will bring it down dreadfully. On the other hand, if a worker have a variety in tasks, then he would employ all his energy in finalizing his work list. Moreover, assigning myriad tasks to workers would make them more creative. Variability in the job cause workers to squeeze every thought in their minds to be efficient and productive. My own experience is a good example of this. I once worked in a retail company, where I used to perform the same exact tasks every day. After a while, I felt that I was drowning in a big ocean of routine and boring days. Going to work became a big challenge with very minimal motivation. Because of that, I started to care less about my duties and I became a reckless irresponsible worker, which is not who I am personally. If there was a variety in my tasks, a better job could have been done.
Furthermore, doing several types of tasks would increase competition, since several workers would do common jobs. Different duties might galvanize workers to be the best in what they do. If several workers do the same job, in order to be unique, a worker must involve all his efforts in job completion. This would save work, time and effort on the company as a whole, and would rise it to the peak. Moreover, in this way, workers might have more opportunity to be promoted to a higher position. When a worker makes an advantageous job, he would craft new projects and substantiate his qualities, and eventually he would be noticed by his leaders. Because of that, he will be a better person with an exceptional future. As I said above, in my previous job, every worker had one and only task to do. We all did not feel that we have competitors in the company due to the fact that every one only masters his task, but does not know how to do other type of jobs. This affected the company since all the workers were functioning like robots without even thinking what they are doing.
As a conclusion, the variety in the tasks of the workers would dramatically increase the level of satisfaction in their job. This would definitely have a bright impact on the personal job experience and on the company as a whole entity.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, while, i feel, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2240.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53441295547 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49512958025 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481781376518 0.524837075471 92% => OK
syllable_count: 718.2 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8836652447 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.962962963 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2962962963 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2962962963 5.45110844103 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234289851027 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690040950229 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780829984886 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161079647016 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689015588931 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.