Every one has their own preferred way of working on their duties and obligations. I certainly believe that workers would be more satisfied if they have several different types of tasks to do, rather than doing the same tasks over and over again. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, the variety in tasks would reduce the routine and boring, which are killer factors in any job. Workers will start not to like to show up at work, and this affect the company terribly. Low motivated workers smash the whole company down to the drain. On the other hand, variable tasks assigned to a worker employs all his energy in finalizing the work list with more creativity. A sales man who practices advertising and accounting as well would squeeze every thought in his mind to be efficient and productive. For, example, working in a retail company where the worker does the same exact tasks every day would make him drown in a big ocean of routine and boring days. Because of that, workers start to care less about duties. They become reckless and irresponsible. So, if there was a variety in tasks, workers would have performed much better.
Furthermore, doing several different types of tasks would increase competition, since several workers would do common jobs. Different duties would galvanize workers to be the best in what they do. If several workers do the same job, in order to be unique, a worker must involve all his efforts in job completion. This definitely saves time and effort on the company as a whole, and would rise it to the peak. In this way, workers would have more opportunity to be promoted to a higher position. As a result, when a worker makes an advantageous job, he would craft new projects and substantiate his qualities. Eventually he would be noticed by his leaders. Because of that, he will be a better person with an exceptional future. As I said above, in my previous example, if the sales man did not do any different task, he might not feel that he have competitors in the company, due to the fact that every one only masters his task. But this worker does not know how to do other type of jobs. This affected the company since all of the workers were functioning like robots without even thinking what they are doing.
As a conclusion, the variety in the tasks of the workers would dramatically increase the level of satisfaction in their job. This would definitely have a bright impact on the personal job experience and on the company as a whole entity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...rs would be more satisfied if they have several different types of tasks to do, rather than doing...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...rmed much better. Furthermore, doing several different types of tasks would increase competiti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1023, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...f jobs. This affected the company since all of the workers were functioning like robots wi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, well, i feel, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2098.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67260579065 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5258991993 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489977728285 0.524837075471 93% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1177124182 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.92 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.96 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255260041191 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767293933282 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810785384571 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171814061227 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667068372857 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.