As the world become more advanced, various types of new kind of jobs will emerge. As we have seen that occupation such as tutor for English language, software programmer have been emerged recently. Also, along with addition of new jobs, nowadays, a single job involve various kinds of working activities- manager profession have to deal with policy making, level of standard of working, co-ordination for other department and agency. There is a fervor argument about the tasks done by a people while doing jobs. Some argue the satisfaction is high when employee is undertake various kind of task rather than single task, however, other believe vice-versa. Personally, I believe people are satisfied with doing multiple task in any jobs.
Nowadays, generally office time is usually of eight hours, which is a long period, so involving only in single task, may be monotonous. The people may think their work as banal and do not have any enthusiasm, so it may deteriorate performance; thus, employee may be vituperated by the manager or other higher rank employee. As a result, I may have serious consequence in their life because he is neither glad with his job nor he is admired by employee.
Furthermore, involvement is various task might help employee to extend their horizon. If we are involved in various task within a single job posts, then we can get to deal with various challenges and experience of it can acts as pivotal factor for his career growth. For instance, while I was working in a pharmaceutical company, unlike monotonous task, I had to deal with various task such as working in all production department, quality control department and Packaging department. However, My peer worked did only a single department. They either work in production or in quality control, so they have only limited knowledge. Thus, I, having a experience in numerous department, have a good CV and have a higher chance to get enrolled in repudiated company than my friends.
However, Some may argue that involving only in particular task may increase the person efficacy as they fully devote only in single activity. But I still insist for giving multiple task because having involved only in single task also increase chance of being monotonous. It can be mitigated by providing a people to do major task along with other smaller tasks. It can aids in both relieve from monotonous and extend of horizon.
Finally,due to aforementioned reasons, company, I believe, should give various task to the employee. As for company to be will being, it depends on performance and knowledge of people and providing multiple task to employee provides such aspects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 566, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'undertaken'.
Suggestion: undertaken
...e satisfaction is high when employee is undertake various kind of task rather than single...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'act'
Suggestion: act
...ous challenges and experience of it can acts as pivotal factor for his career growth...
^^^^
Line 5, column 647, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...only limited knowledge. Thus, I, having a experience in numerous department, have...
^
Line 7, column 371, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'aid'
Suggestion: aid
... along with other smaller tasks. It can aids in both relieve from monotonous and ext...
^^^^
Line 9, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , due
...tonous and extend of horizon. Finally,due to aforementioned reasons, company, I b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, while, as for, for instance, in particular, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2222.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06150341686 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80689209269 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498861047836 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1698148819 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.80952381 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9047619048 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219127768313 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757083485322 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502267417784 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128089153646 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433910206374 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.