We all work or will work in our jobs with many different kinds of people. In your opinion, what are some important characteristics of a co-worker (someone you work closely with)? Use reasons and specific examples to explain why these characteristics are important.
These days, most of the companies gain their success in a result of the team work. They oriented on building and development stong teams, where each of the group members has to be a reliable professional with the capability of the development. Therefore, in my opinion, the most important characteristics of a co-worker are reliability and the aspiration to thrive as a professional.
First of all, reliable co-worker benefits the entire team. If the person we work with is always on tame to work and follows the schedule, the team has all of the members on board to performing their job`s duties. It lets the group organize the work process effectively and accomplish projects they work on successfully. Conversely, when a co-worker is not reliable and does not show up at the work place properly, all members of the team straggle. This is becaues the other workers have to accomplish his tasks. For example, one of my co-workers is always late for work. Moreover, sometimes he takes off during the shift and my collegues and I have to stay late to get all the work done. To that end, an unreliable co-worker lets his team down.
Socondly, the worker, who is willing to grow as a professional is a great advantage for the team. When people constantly develop their knowledge by learning about innovations in their field, and attending different treinings and conferences, they can help their colleagues with advice or a second opinion. Moreover, skilled co-workers can share their experience and knowledge with new employees and therefore, contribute to the development of the team. For instance, my co-worker, I mentioned above, is a incredibly lazy person, who does not want to learn new things. As a result, he is not able to work with the company`s customers properly and the other members have to correct the mistakes he makes and deal with the unsatisfied clients. So, the unprofessional co-worker is a burden for the other team members.
To conclude, I think that the best co-worker is a person, who I can count on and respect him for the professional dedication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 151, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... and follows the schedule, the team has all of the members on board to performing their jo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ollows the schedule, the team has all of the members on board to performing their...
^^
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ce, my co-worker, I mentioned above, is a incredibly lazy person, who does not wa...
^
Line 3, column 768, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atisfied clients. So, the unprofessional co-worker is a burden for the other team...
^^
Line 4, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ct him for the professional dedication.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, i think, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94586894587 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00849844561 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504273504274 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 6.0 0.994623655914 603% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.455135087 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4444444444 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274670663509 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928318925628 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523506664351 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157400691324 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077277622661 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.