Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that the job has a paramount role in people’s life. They spend the most important part of their precious life in workplaces and the progress in their job could help them to have a better life. Indeed, they should different tasks in different positions. Not all people concur when this issue arises. Being cognizant to the logic behind those who repudiate or endorse a legitimacy of this contention, not having any biased perception, I presume that most workers have the tendency to do some multitask duties in a specific workplace and it gives them a sense of satisfying. Among a plentitude of reason in support of this assertion, the opportunity for improving in their career and increase their self-confidence could be picked out for further analysis.
To commence with, a consensus has yet to be reached; however, regarding job as an important meant to become experienced, based upon the statistics of different general successful companies, managers are unanimous about the conviction that coworkers who are able to do different tasks, could easily promote their career and occupying high grades in companies; moreover, this is an incentive factor for workers attempting to being useful and skilled in different duties. Although, companies are willing to employee some people who are perfect in one special profession, multitask workers has a priority to single-task employees. In addition, the worker could increase their experience by doing various tasks and show their ability to their managers. Thus, it could help them promote easily. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above. The results of a study carried out by Rice University’s graduate students unveiled the fact that about 85 percent of employee in Generals Motors company could get the promotion based on their skills to work in different positions. These results show the effect of this ability on the stimulating workers.
In addition to the reason raised above; benefits of doing different tasks on workers mind could also substantiate the justifiability of the claim made at the outset of this essay. In conjunction with public belief, worker good receives some positive signals by people around them by showing skills to do multitask. Thus, these signals give them a sense of honor and enhance their self-confidence. For instance, I worked in the computer company. I learned to do different duties without any help. My behavior has been encouraged by my manager and it increases my energy and found this fact that I am a useful person for my company.
Drawing upon the above reasons, discreetly put, as far as my personal perspective on the topic is concerned, I reiterate that workers like to perform in various tasks during the work hours. Not only does help them to improve their job position but also it gives them a sense of self-confidence and usefulness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 631, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ives them a sense of satisfying. Among a plentitude of reason in support of this ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for instance, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2444.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07053941909 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87520430823 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520746887967 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 765.9 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 96.9069263828 48.9658058833 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.380952381 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9523809524 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38095238095 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19032516399 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578263056265 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570007003808 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115787797737 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412757414791 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.