4-Day Workweek
The article states that 4-day workweek instead of 5 day workweek will have several benefits to both employees and businesses and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that reduction of work days can offer some benefits but they don’t justify that converting and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading states that 4-day workweek will reduce some expenses for employee. The professor refutes this point by stating that the reduction in expenses is true bout the amount is not logical. He explains that the amount of fuel reduction because of elimination of one day’s driving is not as much as we can count on it.
Second, the article claims that having 4-day workweek will lower the operating costs of businesses. However, the professor contends that with converting working days, businesses will lose 20 percent of their consumers. He says that working 10 hours per day leads to working until evening which the number of consumers is low on that time. So they will not have justified benefits.
Third, the reading avers that reducing number of working days will increase the time that employees can spend with their family and improve their quality of life. The lecture opposes this point by saying that this is not a significant benefit. The professor says that because of 10 hour working per day, employee should spend money for day care facilities and also will not have enough time to be with family during first half of week.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'workweek' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'workweeks'.
Suggestion: workweeks
...es that 4-day workweek instead of 5 day workweek will have several benefits to both empl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 282, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
.... The professor says that because of 10 hour working per day, employee should spend ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04032258065 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44618190888 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532258064516 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9738675315 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.166666667 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338209725435 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137228724766 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147602826519 0.0662205650399 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234812205009 0.162205337803 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895375741609 0.0443174109184 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.