The article discuses the advantages of using and providing organic food. In the lecture, however, the professor challenges these claims.
The first point that article makes is that organic foods are much better for human health, mainly because they do not contain fertilizing chemicals. The professor, however, claims that organic foods are not that great and he also adds that there is another type of chemical that is used in organic foods and that it’s highly toxic for humans.
The second point that the article makes is that traditional farming leaves a lot of pesticides into the ground every year and that organic food does not contain any fertilizers or pesticides in it. But, the professor argues by saying that organic farmers produce twenty percent less food than traditional farmers and that for producing the same amount as the traditional farms they cut off forests because they need more space.
Finally, the article suggests that small farmers get benefits too. However, the professor highlights that in early nineties big corporations bought organic food companies and that nowadays we don’t see them advertising their product.
The article discuses the advantages of using and providing organic food. In the lecture, however, the professor challenges these claims.
The first point that article makes is that organic foods are much better for human health, mainly because they do not contain fertilizing chemicals. The professor, however, claims that organic foods are not that great and he also adds that there is another type of chemical that is used in organic foods and that it’s highly toxic for humans.
The second point that the article makes is that traditional farming leaves a lot of pesticides into the ground every year and that organic food does not contain any fertilizers or pesticides in it. But, the professor argues by saying that organic farmers produce twenty percent less food than traditional farmers and that for producing the same amount as the traditional farms they cut off forests because they need more space.
Finally, the article suggests that small farmers get benefits too. However, the professor highlights that in early nineties big corporations bought organic food companies and that nowadays we don’t see them advertising their product.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... it's highly toxic for humans. The second point that the article makes is ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 30.3222958057 33% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 184.0 270.72406181 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3152173913 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48853704717 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603260869565 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7654363484 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.603655291329 0.272083759551 222% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.272864568273 0.0996497079465 274% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.175493013158 0.0662205650399 265% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.392774396301 0.162205337803 242% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.212596621081 0.0443174109184 480% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.