The article discuses three theories that try to explain how the hydrogen can be used as a gasoline for cars. In the lecture, however, the professor challenges these claims.
The first theory that the article makes is that the hydrogen is very common on the planet and that we can mix it with water to get fuel. The professor, however, suggests that hydrogen is not that accessible as it seems and that water does not only consist of hydrogen. There are a lot of different elements too.
The second point that the article makes is that hydrogen can be stored in cars as a gasoline and it also suggests that hydrogen is not flammable and it’s much safer. But, the professor, however, argues that hydrogen is the most flammable element in the world and that if we store hydrogen in cars as a fuel there is great chance of massive explosion while crashing.
Finally, the article suggests that it’s more efficient to use hydrogen instead of gasoline and that we can travel much safer and longer. However, the professor disagrees with the article by highlighting that it requires a lot of energy for transforming hydrogen into gasoline. And she also adds that hydrogen is not safe at all and we will spend much on hydrogen than we spend on gasoline today.
The article discuses three theories that try to explain how the hydrogen can be used as a gasoline for cars. In the lecture, however, the professor challenges these claims.
The first theory that the article makes is that the hydrogen is very common on the planet and that we can mix it with water to get fuel. The professor, however, suggests that hydrogen is not that accessible as it seems and that water does not only consist of hydrogen. There are a lot of different elements too.
The second point that the article makes is that hydrogen can be stored in cars as a gasoline and it also suggests that hydrogen is not flammable and it’s much safer. But, the professor, however, argues that hydrogen is the most flammable element in the world and that if we store hydrogen in cars as a fuel there is great chance of massive explosion while crashing.
Finally, the article suggests that it’s more efficient to use hydrogen instead of gasoline and that we can travel much safer and longer. However, the professor disagrees with the article by highlighting that it requires a lot of energy for transforming hydrogen into gasoline. And she also adds that hydrogen is not safe at all and we will spend much on hydrogen than we spend on gasoline today.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75113122172 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48748634101 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 145.348785872 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47963800905 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7950910491 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.566737559505 0.272083759551 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.239086536022 0.0996497079465 240% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179314797095 0.0662205650399 271% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.41517964258 0.162205337803 256% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.251524287972 0.0443174109184 568% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 63.6247240618 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.