Company
The article states that working a four-day workweek for four-fifth of their normal pay would be beneficial for companies and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that it provides some negative conditions for company and society and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading claims that this policy increase companies’ profits because the employees would feel more rested and alert. The professor refutes this point by saying that force more companies spend more money. He states that the company should pay the same health cost for working less and also the companies have to buy more office base and computers for workers.
In addition, the article posits that the companies would have fewer overworked and error-prone employees for the same money. However, the professor says that the workers might work more because the companies expect the workers to do their work truly and completely, although they have less time.
Finally, reading says that this idea reduces unemployment rates, whereas, the companies want to obtain enough profit, then they ought to employ more workers. The professor opposes this point by explaining that the employees may work a lot. Therefore, these conditions influence on their life and decrease pleasure and good feeling of a sufficient life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 30.3222958057 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30841121495 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.349143084 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551401869159 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3387116282 49.2860985944 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.6 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332903374712 0.272083759551 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150740948757 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857290105613 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220864156101 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844824949891 0.0443174109184 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.