electronic medical record
In the lecture the professor is talking about electronic medical record and that it could not bring as many as benefit that reading passage mentions. However, the professor's talking refutes the reading on account of the following reasons.
First, the professor mentions that reading passage overstates the reduction cost of paper records. In other words, doctors should keep the paper records in addition to electronic record to apply them as an emergency backup or legal uses. In fact, they have to pay the storage cost for electronic record as well as paper record. On the other hand, the reading states that computerized recording probably diminish the cost of storing.
Second, the professor highlights that most doctors including whom use electronic record still implement pen and pencil and their hands to write transcription and their staff will enter the data into electronics system. As a result, their staffs more likely make a mistake during reading the document that the doctor has already written. In contrast, the reading passage clarifies that electronic entering will avoid the commonplace error.
Third, the professor stresses that there is a strict regulation about keeping the patient data privet in the United States. Consequently, researchers are not allowed to use the database except if they follow the rules and get permission from patients. On the other hand, the reading mentions that electronic medical record is a great contributory factor for aiding research.
To sum up, the professor's lecture refutes the reading passage. No evidence for diminishing the cost, error and strict privacy law in United States demonstrate that advantage of electronic database over traditional paper based is in doubt.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, still, third, well, in addition, in contrast, in fact, talking about, as a result, as well as, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37867647059 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66458404068 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0285204465 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5714285714 7.06452816374 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360876060188 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126704040506 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137715975494 0.0662205650399 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193723804204 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769527834538 0.0443174109184 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.