integrated 44
The reading passage concentrates on several theories about the silver coins dating which is found in the North America. Conversely, the lecturer respectively points out the problems in all his assertions.
First, even though the reading passage suggests that there was a large distance between the Native American site in Maine, where the coin was located, and the eastern Canada, where the Norse first arrived from Europe, the speaker claims that it is just a case with the coins and there were lots of other objects which were found in the Native America that came from the Europe. So, this theory is ruled out.
Second, despite the statement in the reading passage that there is no other silver coins at the Canadian sites, the speaker contends that the European are not permanent settlements and they had some packs for voyage. So, it is less possible that they brought all their materials such as coins back to the Europe.
Finally, the reading passage explains that as far as there is no use of the European silver coins in the Native and North America, it is less certain that they carried coins to the aforementioned sites. On the other hand, the lecturer argues that though there was no use of these coins in the America, these coins had other applications and could be used as jewelry and necklace since American people appreciated unusual objects. Hence, this theory is refuted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he statement in the reading passage that there is no other silver coins at the Ca...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'second', 'so', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.268199233716 0.261695866417 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.137931034483 0.158904122519 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0574712643678 0.0723426182421 79% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0536398467433 0.0435111971325 123% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0306513409962 0.0277247811725 111% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130268199234 0.128828473217 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0306513409962 0.0370669169778 83% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.35627470373 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00766283524904 0.0208969081088 37% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00766283524904 0.00154638098197 496% => OK
Determiners: 0.149425287356 0.128158765124 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00383141762452 0.0158828679856 24% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0191570881226 0.0114777025283 167% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1392.0 1645.83664459 85% => OK
No of words: 237.0 271.125827815 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87341772152 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04852973271 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.341772151899 0.374372842146 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.257383966245 0.287516216867 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.139240506329 0.187439937562 74% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0464135021097 0.113142543107 41% => More words length more than 8 chars wanted.
Word Length SD: 2.35627470373 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523206751055 0.539623497131 97% => OK
Word variations: 48.8402808904 53.8517498576 91% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 26.3333333333 21.7502111507 121% => OK
Sentence length SD: 106.091272142 49.3711431718 215% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 154.666666667 132.220823453 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 21.7502111507 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.888888888889 0.878197800319 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 52.0717299578 50.5018328374 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.93103448276 1.90840788429 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.147074171387 0.142949733639 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.127283006503 0.0787303798458 162% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.648581493178 0.631733273073 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.276182301293 0.139662658121 198% => Sentences are changing often in a paragraphs.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.498774921823 0.414875509568 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0452558164457 0.0530846634433 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 10.2958057395 58% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.