Invasive species cause most of the worst problems in local ecosystems. The presence of a new species, particularly one at the top of the food chain, can destroy an ecosystem and cause numerous species to become extinct. One species that is causing numerous problems in America’s waterway is the aquatic zebra mussel.
Native to Russia, the zebra mussel has recently invaded the Great Lakes and many other American lakes and rivers. The mussels attach themselves to the bottoms of boats, a convenient method that lets them travel easily. They also often attach themselves to water pipes. This action results in clogged pipes, some of which are used to bring drinking water to cities. The blocked pipes cost the cities huge amounts of money to unblock. Also, zebra mussels reproduced so rapidly that they often smother the spawning grounds of various fish and other mussels, thereby prohibiting their growth.
Additionally, zebra mussels in North America have very few natural enemies, meaning that it is diffcult to eliminate them once they are established in a river or lake. Likewise, scientists have yet to discover an environmentally-safe way to kill zebra mussels. These two facts help contribute to the extremely rapid expansion of the zebra mussels. Should this expansion not be stopped, zebra mussels will soon be causing problems in virtually all of the country’s waterways.
The reading and lecture materials are concerned with the characteristics of a successful HIV prevention program. The professor discusses Thailand's HIV prevention program to illustrates the claim made in the reading passage.
First of all, the professor discusses investing more money and having stable funding contribute to the success of Thailand's HIV prevention program. In fact, he says that Thailand's HIV prevention program used to be poorly funded and not high priority by the government. However, Thailand government realized the dangerous of HIV, so they decided to increase the funding by 2000 percent and sustain the fund of this program. This supports the claim of the reading passage that a successful HIV program need to receive a large and stable funding.
Secondly, the professor talks about Thailand was able to lower rate of new infection considerably by implementing aggressive education program. He argues that by teaching the people who is most contracting to the virus like drug users or young un marriage men/women. The education indicates the dangerous of sharing drug needle or unprotected sex to these people, thus the program is able decline the number of new infection. This illustrates the point made in the reading passage that education is essential in the prevention of HIV infection.
Finally, the professor mentions the effectiveness of Thailand's new law in HIV prevention. To illustrate this, he says that HIV infected people have been no longer fare being reported to the government. The result was more people were willing to go tested for HIV virus and thus, the infection rates went down. This exemplifies the point made in the reading passage that accepting HIV patients is able to decline the number of infection.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
...ses Thailands HIV prevention program to illustrates the claim made in the reading passage. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'thus', 'in fact', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.315789473684 0.261695866417 121% => OK
Verbs: 0.164473684211 0.158904122519 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0756578947368 0.0723426182421 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0427631578947 0.0435111971325 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0131578947368 0.0277247811725 47% => OK
Prepositions: 0.105263157895 0.128828473217 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0559210526316 0.0370669169778 151% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.88660144932 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0394736842105 0.0208969081088 189% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.134868421053 0.128158765124 105% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00328947368421 0.0114777025283 29% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1764.0 1645.83664459 107% => OK
No of words: 281.0 271.125827815 104% => OK
Chars per words: 6.27758007117 6.08160592843 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.395017793594 0.374372842146 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.341637010676 0.287516216867 119% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.252669039146 0.187439937562 135% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.181494661922 0.113142543107 160% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88660144932 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494661921708 0.539623497131 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.9292993642 53.8517498576 89% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0714285714 21.7502111507 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.9102337049 49.3711431718 38% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 132.220823453 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 21.7502111507 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.785714285714 0.878197800319 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 54.235129639 50.5018328374 107% => OK
Elegance: 2.16417910448 1.90840788429 113% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360513965499 0.549887131256 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.170456472804 0.142949733639 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0896417675357 0.0787303798458 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.667752314256 0.631733273073 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0961867754557 0.139662658121 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20460939419 0.266732575781 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614058126566 0.103435571967 59% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.557129006565 0.414875509568 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.061493127221 0.0530846634433 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291256542686 0.40443939384 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300519165303 0.0528353158467 57% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.