Professors should attain tv shows or not
The article states that professors giving expert commentary is benificial for their own reputation, for university's promotion and also a good communicational medium to distribute knowledge among general people to let them come to know about latest technological advances. However professor thake the stand that it is nor benificial to professor's reputation neither to the univesity, and refutes each of the author's reasons.
The first point in reading claims that professors giving expert lecture gains reputation, but the professor in lecture claims that, this act gives a negative impact on other professor's mind and thinks, this professor dedicates less time to research and other important activity and with this the professor is not invited in important seminars and discussion.
Secondly, the reading paragraph states that, with the professor giving expert lecture on television makes a positive impact on university's reputation and in turn attracts more donation and application from students, but the professor in lecture says that, this wastes the important time of professor. Telivision shows consumes time for transportation, retake, good look, etcetra. This time dedicated for research and for interaction with students would be much more usefull.
Third the reading says that it the professors lecture on telivision would be good for knowledge distribution among general people and as this people don't have much contact with professor's, they would also come to know about ongoing technological advancement. But the professor in lecture claims that the expert shows would just provide general overview of the subject and other fundamental things, and the same can be provided by the telivision anchors by doing little research on their own.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'about the latest'.
Suggestion: about the latest
...general people to let them come to know about latest technological advances. However profess...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ow about latest technological advances. However professor thake the stand that it is no...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 425, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd refutes each of the authors reasons. The first point in reading claims that p...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d in important seminars and discussion. Secondly, the reading paragraph states t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th students would be much more usefull. Third the reading says that it the profe...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...istribution among general people and as this people dont have much contact with prof...
^^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...among general people and as this people dont have much contact with professors, they...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57462686567 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88767400718 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492537313433 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.803984457 49.2860985944 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 186.75 110.228320801 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5 21.698381199 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165044100627 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816307016308 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479441066137 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113193636034 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023474860789 0.0443174109184 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 13.3589403974 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 53.8541721854 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.0289183223 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.62 12.2367328918 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 10.7273730684 191% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.