Recently, there has been a debate about the influence of declining in the reading of novel, plays, and poem on the society, which in turn may lead to culture decline.
Recently, there has been a debate about the influence of declining in the reading of novel, plays, and poem on the society, which in turn may lead to culture decline. Many researchers support this idea, the author in the reading passage is one of them. While, others adopt another side of view, as the professor did in the lecture and he argues each point have been raised by the author.
First of all, the lecturer claims that history, science, and political analysis books are well-written books, when people read these kinds of books they get the same level of benefits as if they read novels or poems. Furthermore, they are intellectual and imagination stimulant as literature books. So, the text point regarding the bad quality of these books and the bad influence of them on the culture does not make sense anymore.
Second, the speaker asserts that listening to music and watching movies are not less important than reading literature. More ever, people can enjoy them and get benefits of them at the same time. Even though, the author tries to convince us that they are not important to the culture and they are just kind of wasting time.In turn, that would lead to decline in the culture. But the professor successfully refutes this idea.
Finally, the professor assumes the truth of the third point in the text, which talks about the low supporting to the literature. Then, he says it is the authors' fault because they used to write books with difficult language and hard to understand. So, no one like to read this type of books, which in turn lead to decrease in the desire of publisher to adapt these type of books.
In conclusion, the professor seriously challenges each part of the reading passage and he can successfully support his idea with many evidence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, there has been a debate about ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... point have been raised by the author. First of all, the lecturer claims that h...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e culture does not make sense anymore. Second, the speaker asserts that listeni...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... and they are just kind of wasting time.In turn, that would lead to decline in the...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fessor successfully refutes this idea. Finally, the professor assumes the truth...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ublisher to adapt these type of books. In conclusion, the professor seriously c...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun evidence seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much evidence', 'a good deal of evidence'.
Suggestion: much evidence; a good deal of evidence
... can successfully support his idea with many evidence.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, regarding, second, so, then, third, well, while, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79153094463 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46877173863 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543973941368 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4090864349 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.071428571 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313493033676 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112500542164 0.0996497079465 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.249104512404 0.0662205650399 376% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168605820499 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181492681433 0.0443174109184 410% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.