Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage.
The passage emerges the problem of declining of frogs’ populations in the wild. Since their disappearance will lead to problems which affect humankind, the passage mainly provides some methods which will be able to turn the situation to better. However, the lecturer has an opposite opinion by saying that all these methods are useless.
At first, the passage presents of the idea to put restrictions on farmers who use pesticides at their farms situated near frog habitats. There is information that they will lead to serious damages in frog bodies. Otherwise, the lecturer controversies this method; she says that it will be economically unfair for farmers. The main reason why she think so is that farmers use pesticides for killing dangerous insects, in the case of strict limitations they may lose all their crops.
The next method described in the passage is a new treatment of a fungus – the disease which reduces the population of frogs. Controversially, the lecturer says that this new healing method will not help to improve the situation. She says a lot of disadvantages in this as the complexity to treat every frog individually; the treatment has to be repeated for every future generation. Thus, this method is expensive.
The last method described in the passage is that people have to protect the places of frog locations which are lakes, rivers. Since these places are affected negatively by human activities, the strict rules must be accepted. Again the lecturer does not think this idea is great, because she says that such places most of all are in danger of depleting because of global warming rather than people actions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
...ir for farmers. The main reason why she think so is that farmers use pesticides for k...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ration. Thus, this method is expensive. The last method described in the passage...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bal warming rather than people actions.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, so, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 7.30242825607 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09157509158 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76470646171 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542124542125 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0102681407 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2857142857 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 7.06452816374 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0844863729217 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353873598959 0.0996497079465 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0224880073864 0.0662205650399 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0550585979081 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0124259180728 0.0443174109184 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.