The article here discusses the Tidal Power produced by constructing dams and barrages across river estuary or at the mouth of the bay. The article also discusses the requirements and benefits about tidal power. However, the professor in lecture bring into consideration various drawbacks on the environment, the economy of that region and damage to marine life and refuses to the point made in the article.
First, the article describes that by the use difference in water level during high and low tides power can be generated. But the professor says only the fraction of power is only generated and there can be only little contribution at the regional level.
Second, the article states that there is no pollution, no release of greenhouse gases. But the professor points out some points that affect and damage the surrounding ecosystem. The first point as stated by professor is change in quality of water which would affect the wildlife in that surrounding region. Second the change in level of mud and sediments in that particluar area or region where dam is constucted would affect birds, and third point in continuation with this, due to increase in salinity of water would result in increase in red tide organism which paralyse shell fish and disrupt the marine ecosystem.
Third, the professor states that the migratory fish would not be able to cross the dam or barrage and would affect the fish migratory path. Also the professor stated that, design can be made for this drawback but this would increase the cost of project. And lastly the professor also stated that the fishing boats are dependent on bays and opening of river and thus constucting a dam across this would affect the fishing boat and in turn the economy of that region.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...d would affect the fish migratory path. Also the professor stated that, design can b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, second, so, third, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 7.30242825607 288% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93918918919 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51412191126 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483108108108 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2975776261 49.2860985944 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.833333333 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133652760019 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706812142266 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121352179713 0.0662205650399 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106772708493 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122975954065 0.0443174109184 277% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.