The article states that providing four-day work week will be benefit for both the company and a worker and provide three possible reason of support. The professor, however, explains that providing four-day work week will produce an unwholesome effect on both the company and worker and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that company will be profit because of effectiveness of labor in work. The professor refutes this point by saying that it causes an deleterious effect on company. He states that giving four-day work week will make a company to increase in number of men which causes the company to spend more on making extra room, additional computer additional health insurance and also, for training of amateur worker.
Second, the article posits that the four-day plan will provide an employment opportunity. However, the professor says that it will create an unemployment opportunity. According to professor,rather than intake of new employee, the company may want a worker to do the same amount of work in four days, by giving them an option of overtime and thus, deteriorate a working ambience of worker .
Third, the reading says that four-day plan will increase a quality of life of worker. The professor opposes this point by saying that this leads to risk of job availability during a economic downturn thus affecting quality of life. We also learn that it may be hindrance for a career development because the company may want a person to prefer to work a five-day in their higher position for for a continuous assessment and monitoring for their work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...tes this point by saying that it causes an deleterious effect on company. He state...
^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , rather
...ment opportunity. According to professor,rather than intake of new employee, the compan...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...deteriorate a working ambience of worker . Third, the reading says that four-da...
^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eads to risk of job availability during a economic downturn thus affecting qualit...
^
Line 7, column 389, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: for
...ork a five-day in their higher position for for a continuous assessment and monitoring ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07954545455 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72648756188 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6801105307 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.909090909 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28645947212 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117261021746 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734348811791 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19393586907 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303497281913 0.0443174109184 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.