The lecture and the reading both discuss about four day week work and its positive negative effect of company and employee. While the reading state that if employee willing to accept less payment for four day week rather than five day week. in four day work they have earn 80 percent of five day work. The lecture refute this saying that four day plan not work always positively for employee and company.
First of all, the reading claim that employee willing to receive 80 percent of five day work in four day. that's why company can afford more employee to fulfill there purpose in same price level.However, the lecture argue that in four day plan company forced to involve new people but they have also medical facility. medical facility are same for four or five day employee. more office space and computer are essential for new employee.
Secondly, the reading makes the argument that if four day plan successful more employment opportunity created. and there work load are shifted each other. the lecture counter this point by saying that if four day work load are equal to the five day work load that make there job more unpleasant. overtime maybe forced by company.
Finally, the reading passage claim that employees are afford lower salary to expend more quality time with the family and enjoy leisure activities. However, the lecture refutes this claim by pointing out that when crisis time happen than more people are who work for four days they are more vulnerable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 210, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'week' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'weeks'.
Suggestion: weeks
...ing to accept less payment for four day week rather than five day week. in four day ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 236, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'week' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'weeks'.
Suggestion: weeks
... for four day week rather than five day week. in four day work they have earn 80 per...
^^^^
Line 2, column 242, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...our day week rather than five day week. in four day work they have earn 80 percent...
^^
Line 2, column 269, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'earned'.
Suggestion: earned
...ve day week. in four day work they have earn 80 percent of five day work. The lectur...
^^^^
Line 2, column 315, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'refutes'.
Suggestion: refutes
...0 percent of five day work. The lecture refute this saying that four day plan not work...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 357, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put before the verb 'work'.
Suggestion: always work
...fute this saying that four day plan not work always positively for employee and company. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thats
...0 percent of five day work in four day. thats why company can afford more employee to...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...0 percent of five day work in four day. thats why company can afford more employee to...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 195, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...lfill there purpose in same price level.However, the lecture argue that in four day pla...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 318, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Medical
...le but they have also medical facility. medical facility are same for four or five day ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 365, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'employee' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'employees'.
Suggestion: employees
... facility are same for four or five day employee. more office space and computer are ess...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 375, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: More
...are same for four or five day employee. more office space and computer are essential...
^^^^
Line 6, column 59, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'plan' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'plans'.
Suggestion: plans
...ing makes the argument that if four day plan successful more employment opportunity ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...ul more employment opportunity created. and there work load are shifted each other....
^^^
Line 6, column 156, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...there work load are shifted each other. the lecture counter this point by saying th...
^^^
Line 6, column 297, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overtime
...ad that make there job more unpleasant. overtime maybe forced by company. Finally, th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 55, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'afforded'.
Suggestion: afforded
...eading passage claim that employees are afford lower salary to expend more quality tim...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 62, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to low', 'to lower'
Suggestion: to low; to lower
...passage claim that employees are afford lower salary to expend more quality time with...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89328063241 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16666416301 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486166007905 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 384.3 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.9517721151 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4285714286 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 18.0 4.19205298013 429% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383806313552 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162034533711 0.0996497079465 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080703307095 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26348322202 0.162205337803 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761857040289 0.0443174109184 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.