Both the reading and the lecture discuss the merits and the demerits of teamwork. The reading provides a numerous benefits of the teamwork. However, the lecture disapproves all of these claims, and provides three points of support.
First of all, the reading states that teamwork members are able to finish the work faster since the great number of the individuals involved have a wide range of knowledge, experience, skills, and resources. On the other hand, the professor refutes this point by explaining that teamwork waste a tremendous amount of time to reach an agreement on the issue discussed in the project.
secondly, the reading suggests that teamwork is a really rewarding due to the fact that the members of the team feel good about themselves when they are giving a voice in making a decision. Nevertheless, the lecture contradicts this idea by stating that in the group, there are certain members who like to impose their opinions on the rest of the group and if the rest of the group develop an idea , it is going to be dismissed instead of being discussed.
Finally, the reading claims that members of the group have a better chance to shine and their ideas are highly significant. However, the professor opposes this idea by saying that some members of the team get a free ride. Eventhough they did not put in any effort in the project, they get recognitions and credits as same as the diligent workers who contribute greatly to the project.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both the reading and the lecture discuss...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'benefit'?
Suggestion: benefit
...amwork. The reading provides a numerous benefits of the teamwork. However, the lecture d...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umber of the individuals involved have a wide range of knowledge, experience, ski...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the issue discussed in the project. secondly, the reading suggests that team...
^^^
Line 6, column 4, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...e issue discussed in the project. secondly, the reading suggests that teamwork is ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 401, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...if the rest of the group develop an idea , it is going to be dismissed instead of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.892 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60710020457 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4324434889 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.3 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253515563987 0.272083759551 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879670351171 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693139064187 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142208698078 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858269038767 0.0443174109184 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.