In this set of material the reading discuses about the Rembrandt portrait and the characteristics to sustain the fact that really the paint belongs to Rembrandt. In contrast with the reading, the listening describes all the reasons to consider this portrait to the Rembrandt catalogue.
Firstly, It is said in the reading that the way that the women is dressed have a fail, owing to she was wearing a dress with a line cap which only the servant used. It do not fit because as the same time the women is using a fur collar, a piece with a big value. It is reasonable to think that a servant could not be using a fur collar. Hence, Rembrandt cannot neglect this detail. Contrary with the belief of the passage, the listening affirm that in spite of the above, some one added the fur collar to increase the value of the paint.
Secondly, the passage pointed out that the lights and shadows do not fit together. For instance, the painter did not correctly illuminate the women face. The women face is absorbing the light and do not look realistic as the Rembrandt paintings. Rembrandt was carefully with those details. But conversely, the listening suggest that the restoration caused this mistake in lights and shadows.
Finally, It is said in the reading that the painting has a several pieces of wood glued together and the Rembrandt paintings were setting only with a piece of wood. Contraire with the reading, the listening affirm that pieces of wood could be added to rise the value of the Rembrandt portrait.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ally the paint belongs to Rembrandt. In contrast with the reading, the listening describ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'does'?
Suggestion: does
...ne cap which only the servant used. It do not fit because as the same time the wo...
^^
Line 3, column 474, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...ning affirm that in spite of the above, some one added the fur collar to increase the va...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'look', 'really', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'for instance', 'in contrast', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.267123287671 0.261695866417 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.16095890411 0.158904122519 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0308219178082 0.0723426182421 43% => Some adjectives wanted.
Adverbs: 0.0582191780822 0.0435111971325 134% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0171232876712 0.0277247811725 62% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116438356164 0.128828473217 90% => OK
Participles: 0.041095890411 0.0370669169778 111% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.5326912054 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.027397260274 0.0208969081088 131% => OK
Particles: 0.00342465753425 0.00154638098197 221% => OK
Determiners: 0.184931506849 0.128158765124 144% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0102739726027 0.0158828679856 65% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00684931506849 0.0114777025283 60% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1522.0 1645.83664459 92% => OK
No of words: 265.0 271.125827815 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74339622642 6.08160592843 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.320754716981 0.374372842146 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.264150943396 0.287516216867 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.177358490566 0.187439937562 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.11320754717 0.113142543107 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5326912054 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494339622642 0.539623497131 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.9247212454 53.8517498576 87% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.9285714286 21.7502111507 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4987091021 49.3711431718 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 132.220823453 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 21.7502111507 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 45.3436657682 50.5018328374 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.79710144928 1.90840788429 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.666248723278 0.549887131256 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.1888863844 0.142949733639 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.14991291556 0.0787303798458 190% => Ideas in sentences are similar.
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.631248853804 0.631733273073 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.249303044286 0.139662658121 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.324553626313 0.266732575781 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140435220541 0.103435571967 136% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.508175424859 0.414875509568 122% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0642338429383 0.0530846634433 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.525655906872 0.40443939384 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716977686174 0.0528353158467 136% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.