The reading states that there are doaubts if some paintings ascribe to Redmbrandt were actually painted by him and provides some reasons of support. The professor, however, explains that those painting attribute to Redmbrandt and refutes each author's reason.
First, the reading claims that there are some inconsistent about the way the woman in the portrait is dressed. But Rembrandt was known for his attention to the details. The professor refutes this point by daying that this inconsistensy relates to the old of painting.
Second, the reading staits that Rembrandt was a master of painting light and shadow, but in this painting these elements do not fit together. The professor explains that the color and shadow could be seen in the origin paintings. She mentions that in the origin paints color and shodow reflects color on the face in the picture. Besides, she adds that the lights is realistic.
Third, the reading claims that examinition of the back of the painting reveals that it the panel was used for the painting is not similar to panels which was used by Rembrandt. The professor, however, refutes this point by saying that Rembrandt used a single wood panel. He says that pieces of panels are the same as the one was used in the paint.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, first, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90610328638 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4788554559 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525821596244 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6705605351 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0833333333 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478023525249 0.272083759551 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172994920653 0.0996497079465 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114933555694 0.0662205650399 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270626285323 0.162205337803 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720586105025 0.0443174109184 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.