The lecture explained how a panel of experts proved that the old lady painting was done by Rembrandt the most famous dutch painter in the seventeenth century, while the passage showed some problems with the painting that suggest it could not be a work done by Rembrandt.
First of all, the passage talked about the inconsistency of the woman's clothes , as she was wearing a white linen cap which is a kind that only servants wear and a coat with a luxurious fur that no servant could afford. But, in the lecture it was mentioned that a panel of experts examined the portrait with x-ray and they discovered that the fur colour was actually painted over the original painting.
Secondly, It was mentioned in the passage that Rembrandt was a master in shadow and light, but in this specific painting they did not fit together . This issue was clarified during the lecture as it was mentioned that once they removed the added colour they found that the lady was wearing a light colour coat which reflexes the colour and elluminate the lady's face.
Thirdly, The original painting was enlarged by adding more wood pieces to the main portrait probably to make it more valuable. This explains why it was mentioned in the passage that this painting was painted on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together although Rembrandt used to paint on wood panels.
Finally, In the lecture, one more factor was mentioned to prove that this painting belong to Rembrandt. The experts found out that the panel used in that specific painting and the panel used in another painting by Rembrandt, which was his self-portrait with a hat, are actually coming from the same type of tree.
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: This issue was clarified during the lecture as it was mentioned that once they removed the added colour they found that the lady was wearing a light colour coat which reflexes the colour and elluminate the lady's face.
Error: elluminate Suggestion: illuminate
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 9 12
No. of Words: 291 250
No. of Characters: 1357 1200
No. of Different Words: 136 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.13 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.663 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.363 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 94 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 74 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 48 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 32.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.129 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.454 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.756 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.121 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4
Are there any comments on the
Are there any comments on the ideas and the organization of the essay ?
There are some warning
There are some warning messages from e-grader, like:
Unique words percentage: 0.474402730375 0.539623497131 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
but if there are no message from human graders, it means the issues are not big and there are no problems from ideas and the organization.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... the inconsistency of the womans clothes , as she was wearing a white linen cap wh...
^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...cific painting they did not fit together . This issue was clarified during the le...
^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g they did not fit together . This issue was clarified during the lecture as it w...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mbrandt used to paint on wood panels. Finally, In the lecture, one more factor...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'while', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.228295819936 0.261695866417 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.189710610932 0.158904122519 119% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0675241157556 0.0723426182421 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0450160771704 0.0435111971325 103% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0385852090032 0.0277247811725 139% => OK
Prepositions: 0.144694533762 0.128828473217 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0675241157556 0.0370669169778 182% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.42452975547 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.016077170418 0.0208969081088 77% => OK
Particles: 0.0032154340836 0.00154638098197 208% => OK
Determiners: 0.151125401929 0.128158765124 118% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0064308681672 0.0158828679856 40% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0192926045016 0.0114777025283 168% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1690.0 1645.83664459 103% => OK
No of words: 293.0 271.125827815 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76791808874 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.320819112628 0.374372842146 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.255972696246 0.287516216867 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.17747440273 0.187439937562 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0750853242321 0.113142543107 66% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42452975547 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474402730375 0.539623497131 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.0490033846 53.8517498576 86% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 32.5555555556 21.7502111507 150% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2160768674 49.3711431718 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 187.777777778 132.220823453 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5555555556 21.7502111507 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 0.878197800319 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 58.1528251801 50.5018328374 115% => OK
Elegance: 1.61176470588 1.90840788429 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.672300988422 0.549887131256 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.204229845316 0.142949733639 143% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0594866090914 0.0787303798458 76% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.790359052263 0.631733273073 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.106836300975 0.139662658121 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.38346556359 0.266732575781 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834637541812 0.103435571967 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.432230049607 0.414875509568 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0733623961917 0.0530846634433 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.478568946892 0.40443939384 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528228251365 0.0528353158467 100% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.