The article discussses dinosaur is endothermic animal and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor states that many scientists aruged this article and she refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading posits that dinosaur fossils have been discovered in polar regions whic suggests only endothermic animals can tolerate in such cold climate. The professor refute this point by explaining that during that time, polar regions was much more warmer during the year. so, many not endothermic animals could have live there. She also says that if polar regions are cold, dinosaur would have migrate or hibernate as many not endothermic would do. So, fossils that have been found in polar regions do not proof dinosaur is endothermic.
Second, the article states that the dinosaur's leg position sustained physcial activities, such as running which supports the idea of dinosaur being endothermic. On the other hand, the professor explains that legs position under the body do not necessarly functioning for physical activity, however, it could be to support the body weight. Dinosaur is large in size, so the position of legs would be weight supportor and not for running purpose. She concludes that dinosaur is not endothermic.
Third, the reading states that fossilized bones of dinosaur usually dense with Haversian canals. The professor opposes this point by saying that dinosaure do have Harversian canals, but dinosaur bones also have growth riings. She explains these rings is evidence that dinosaur stop growing or grow slowly, which support the idea that not endothermic animals can not grow well in coller climate. In addition to one of the characteristic of not endothermic animals is fluctations in growing cycle from rapidly growing to slowly or stop growing. If it grow rapidlt, it would only in warm climate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'refutes'.
Suggestion: refutes
...ate in such cold climate. The professor refute this point by explaining that during th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'warmer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: warmer
...uring that time, polar regions was much more warmer during the year. so, many not endotherm...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...s was much more warmer during the year. so, many not endothermic animals could hav...
^^
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'migrated'.
Suggestion: migrated
...r regions are cold, dinosaur would have migrate or hibernate as many not endothermic wo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: large
...to support the body weight. Dinosaur is large in size, so the position of legs would be weigh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 550, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'grows'?
Suggestion: grows
...rowing to slowly or stop growing. If it grow rapidlt, it would only in warm climate....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, well, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31292517007 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59467411245 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503401360544 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3637755296 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.625 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404809581324 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149404340932 0.0996497079465 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699214395497 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241013000674 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610012688371 0.0443174109184 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.