The article states that dinosaurs were endotherms animals and provides three reasons of support. Conversely, the professor states that many scientists have argued that dinosaurs were endothermic and she refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading posits that according to dinosaur fossils that have been discovered in polar regions, only endothermic animals can tolerate such cold climates. The professor opposes this point by explaining that during that time, polar regions were warmer. So, not endothermic animals can live there. She also adds if there were cold climate, many animals could have migrated or hibernated like reptile animals. And consequently, the discovery of these dinosaur fossils do not proof that dinosaurs were endothermic.
Second, the article claims that the position of legs underneath the dinosaur's body is allows to sustain activity, such as running. this strongly suggests that dinosaurs were endothermic. The professor, on the other hand, explains that this leg positions do necessary functioning for activity like running. There is another explanation for the positions underneath the body, is to support weight. Since the dinosaur had a large size, its leg would be supporter for heavy weight. She concludes that there is no link between dinosaurs being endothermic animals and leg position and movement.
Third, the reading avers that the presence of Haversian canals in dinosaur bones is highly supports that the animal is an endotherm. The professor refutes this point by saying that in addition to Haversian canals that have found inside dinosaur's bones, there are growth rings too. She explains that these rings are thickening bones, and thus animals will not grow rapidly. She mentions also that one of the endothermic animals characteristics is animals has the ability to grow up rapidly even if at cold climates. The growth rings suggests that dinosaurs had stop or grow slowly which indicates they were not endothermic animals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... or hibernated like reptile animals. And consequently, the discovery of these din...
^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'sustaining'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: sustaining
...underneath the dinosaurs body is allows to sustain activity, such as running. this strongl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...s to sustain activity, such as running. this strongly suggests that dinosaurs were e...
^^^^
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: heavyweight
...ge size, its leg would be supporter for heavy weight. She concludes that there is no link be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, conversely, first, if, second, so, third, thus, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45631067961 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66369190284 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517799352751 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.366282471 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.543550505901 0.272083759551 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186295773885 0.0996497079465 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796735780877 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.339547145092 0.162205337803 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479063435992 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.