The lecturer talk about the dinosaurs were not the endotherms and contradict the argue presents in the reading passage.
Firstly, the lecturer mentions that dinosaurs lived in the polar region which were more warmer than today. In fact, during the winter period the dinosaurs migrated in the warmer region for hibernating. The fossils presence in the polar region does not prove that dinosaurs were endotherms. The lecturer challenge the point made by the reading passage that dinosaurs fossil found in the polar regions. Since in the colder region dinosaur maintained the body temperature, they were endotherms.
Secondly, the lecturer states that dinosaur had have more weight causes the larger size which was responsible for the underneath leg positions. The dinosaur leg position was not at the body's side, as same as crocodile and lizards, and the running was not concluded that dinosaurs were endotherms. The lecturer casts doubt the argue made by the reading passage that leg position and physical activity suggest that dinosaurs were endotherms.
Thirdly, the lecturer claims that dinosaurs had have Harversian canals as well as growth ring which helped to thicken the bone and rapid growth of bones. The slow and rapid growth of the bone depend on the growth rings. The lecturer refute the point made by the reading passage that presence of Harvasian canal which was helped the growth of the bones and make the stronger bone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... were not the endotherms and contradict the argue presents in the reading passage. First...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 84, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'warmer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: warmer
...rs lived in the polar region which were more warmer than today. In fact, during the winter ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 206, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fossils'' or 'fossil's'?
Suggestion: fossils'; fossil's
... the warmer region for hibernating. The fossils presence in the polar region does not p...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 303, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'challenges'.
Suggestion: challenges
...dinosaurs were endotherms. The lecturer challenge the point made by the reading passage t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 356, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dinosaurs'' or 'dinosaur's'?
Suggestion: dinosaurs'; dinosaur's
... point made by the reading passage that dinosaurs fossil found in the polar regions. Sinc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
..., the lecturer states that dinosaur had have more weight causes the larger size whic...
^^^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...re endotherms. The lecturer casts doubt the argue made by the reading passage that leg po...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 49, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
... the lecturer claims that dinosaurs had have Harversian canals as well as growth rin...
^^^^
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'refutes'.
Suggestion: refutes
...epend on the growth rings. The lecturer refute the point made by the reading passage t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, third, thirdly, well, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17167381974 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44513937271 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 145.348785872 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454935622318 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7218587724 49.2860985944 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.416666667 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377696907862 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166705044053 0.0996497079465 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774586488638 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231127553188 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801976041265 0.0443174109184 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.