The reading and the lecture are both about the true identity of a big building in Chaco Canyon in New Mexico. The author of the reading suggests three purposes of the building in Chaco could be. The professor casts doubts on the claims made by the author, which he thinks that there are not enough evidence to support.
First of all, the author states that those building could be use as a shelter for hundred of peoples. The similarity in large, well-known "apartment-building" in Taos, Mexico with the building in Chaco Canyon is the root of his theory. The lecturer cast doubt on this claim made by the author. He believes that, even though the similarity outside looks might lead to the conclusion in the reading, the inside might not be so. He further points out that the inside structure is not compatible to hold hundred of people due to the lack of cooking fireplace and rooms.
Sencondly, the author suggests his second theory of those building function as the food storage, which used to keep grain maize for long-lasting use. The professor argues this point made by the author. He, on the other hand, thinks that because there is no trace of maize or maize container, the second theory is a lack of logical evidence to back up itself.
Finally, the reading's third theory mentions the possibility of those building as a ceremonial place. A pile of old material found by the archaeologist in the place is interpreted as an indication for a place in charge for held festival. This interpretation is explained differently by the professor. He thinks that pile of old material and broken pots are mere trash, thrown away by workers and not considered as evidence for the festival place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture are both abo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...oses of the building in Chaco could be. The professor casts doubts on the claims ma...
^^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
... building could be use as a shelter for hundred of peoples. The similarity in large, we...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 512, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...ide structure is not compatible to hold hundred of people due to the lack of cooking fi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., the readings third theory mentions the possibility of those building as a cerem...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, second, so, third, well, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84013605442 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9312229734 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517006802721 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0329252342 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8666666667 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237095715113 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078891035289 0.0996497079465 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454716809816 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14348331947 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00241285475587 0.0443174109184 5% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.