TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th

The reading passage and the lecture discusses an interesting topic pertaining to the native's great houses found on the settlement of Chaco Canyon, in New Mexico. While the reading passage provide three possible theories about the use of these buildings, the lecture casts doubts of every theory provided by the reading passage with supporting arguments.

First of all, the reading passages suggests that one possible use of the great houses was as residential building. On the contrary, the lecture opposes to this idea. The lecture explains that, even though, from the outside, the structure are similar as modern building apartments, from the inside, many features are missing to accept this houses as places to live. For example, the lecture points out that there is not evidence of many fireplaces or rooms where hundred of families would be living comfortably.

Second, the reading passage proposes that the great houses could be used as store places where the main crops where gathered during long periods of time. On the contrary, the lecture claims that, again, there is no solid evidence to support this theory. According to the lecture, scientists could not uncovered rest of crops or corn as remainders in the settlement.

Finally, the reading passage proposes that a third possibility of the use of the houses was as ceremonial center. Again, the lecture, refutes this possibility by arguing that no evidence was found to support this claim. In fact, the lecture explains, that many rests were found in the settlement beside rests of pots, like stones and constructions tools. In consequences, the lecture, finally, concludes that the houses could be used as places for construction.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...dence of many fireplaces or rooms where hundred of families would be living comfortably...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'uncover'
Suggestion: uncover
...ng to the lecture, scientists could not uncovered rest of crops or corn as remainders in ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, second, so, third, while, for example, in fact, first of all, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22262773723 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61260087032 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510948905109 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 2.5761589404 349% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7658728705 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.076923077 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229899916824 0.272083759551 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853555164859 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432351756892 0.0662205650399 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145547579607 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0063841375081 0.0443174109184 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.