The author expresses three functions of the Chaco Canyon, in New Mexico in the American Southwest, including residential place, food storage place and a place for holding ceremonial events. The professor, on the other hand refutes all these three functions by providing the following statements.
First of all, huge number of rooms of the Chaco Canyon, is represented as a proof of its residential function which is mentioned in the article. According to the lecture, although from outside the Chaco Canyon looks like Native American apartments , from inside, there are not as much as fireplaces suitable for housing hundreds of residents. In some floors, there are only 10 fireplaces which can serve 10 families and might not be suitable for hundreds of people. Therefore, how this huge number of people can cook in the Chaco Canyon without enough fireplaces.
Secondly, author claims that the Chaco Canyon might use for grain maize storage. This hypothesis is also refused by the professor, mentioning that there is not any traces of grain maize in the Chaco Canyon building. Moreover, storage containers are not found in the Chaco Canyon structure. Hence, this function of the Chaco Canyon is also rebutted by the professor.
Finally, professor states that the Chaco Canyon cannot be used for ceremonial events, the function which is mentioned in the text. The reason, professor raised is that besides broken pots which were found in the deposits of the mound, there are other materials too. These include construction materials, such as stones and sands and the broken pots might be from the construction workers who threw away their pots when they finished their food. Therefore, deposits of broken pots cannot be the firm evidence of holding a huge and crowded ceremonies in the Chaco Canyon, the theory which is stated in the text.
In conclusion, professor disagrees with the hypothesis of the usage of Chaco Canyon, mentioned by the author including residential purposes, food storage and ceremonial places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...co Canyon, in New Mexico in the American Southwest, including residential place, ...
^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...on looks like Native American apartments , from inside, there are not as much as f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, hence, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 326.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23312883436 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63651486178 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475460122699 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2367438488 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.733333333 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283742862923 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106362831746 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038687729034 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155877151424 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476521607875 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.