The author claims that American wood companies are not likely to have ecocertification and provides three reasons. The lecturer, however, refutes his claims and counter each of his arguments. In additional, he says that achievement of certificate will be promising of American companies.
First, the author says that the Americans, being too much exposed to advertisement, would pay attention for certification and do not trust advertisement claims. In contrast, the lecture claims that the Americans can classify the qualified product from the mediocre products. He further says that American are absorbed towards independent certification of product and the ecocertification is one of the independent certifications.
Second, reading posits that seeking for certification would cause wood company ti rise their product value; thus, leading to lower selling of certified product. However, the lecture argues that when the difference of cost of product is steep then the American will be value motive. but since the product difference is about 5%, the Americans, being fascinated by certification, will buy certified woods.
Third, the reading says that most American woods companies have a domestic consumer, so they is not a necessity of certification. However, the listening claims that due to lack of certification, American people will buy the products of International companies. We have also learned that the American companies, in order to be with competition with international companies, have to make certificate in early or late.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ys that achievement of certificate will be promising of American companies. First, the au...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...then the American will be value motive. but since the product difference is about 5...
^^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
...anies have a domestic consumer, so they is not a necessity of certification. Howev...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, third, thus, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65236051502 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28468930229 2.5805825403 127% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549356223176 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3700391976 49.2860985944 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.75 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412684396981 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152080556448 0.0996497079465 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781583953933 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250839874912 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262584968238 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.8541721854 65% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.2367328918 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.