The reading passage is discussing an interesting topic about the beneficial use of hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine to create electric cars replacing internal-combustion. The reading provides extensive information to support this position. The lecture, on the other hand, casts doubts about the real benefit of the hydrogen resources and argues each of the reasons of the reading passage.
First of all, the reading passage explains very clear that internal-combustion engine that relies on petroleum is a finite resource. Although, the lecturer agrees with this claim, she also remarks that the hydrogen is not easy to get as the reading passage states. Moreover, according to the lecture, water is not a good resource of hydrogen, as the reading passage claims, but liquid hydrogen in its pure state. In consequence, the process involved to get it is very difficult and none practical at all. Thus, the reading passage first point is invalid.
Secondly, the reading passage argues that the internal-combustion engines produces a great amount of pollution in contrast of the hydrogen-based fuel cells. In opposition of this idea, the lecture disagrees explaining that the process to obtain hydrogen is a very polluted one. Consequently, the second reading passage's point of argument is refuted.
Finally, the reading passage reinforces the advantage of the use of fuel-cell engines because of its lower cost. On the contrary, the lecturer, with all the above descriptions, refutes the facts of a lower cost process. According to the lecture, the process to get hydrogen in pure state is very expensive and difficult to apply. As a result, with such reasoning the reading passage's final idea is contradicted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e information to support this position. The lecture, on the other hand, casts doubt...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, in contrast, as a result, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38289962825 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16005247556 2.5805825403 122% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513011152416 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2124084053 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5333333333 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4666666667 7.06452816374 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2297174341 0.272083759551 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858256194667 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108439599316 0.0662205650399 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166038892308 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524981140018 0.0443174109184 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.