In term of whether the environmental pollution or predators are the main cause of decline the number of sea otter. The reading and lecture both contradictory to each other.
First, the reading states that many sea otters had been killed dut to the chemical pollution. On the other hand, the professor refutes this notion by saying that there were not dead sea otter washed out on the beach. So, it was a weak hypothessis. Moreover, the preditor's hypothesis was more conviencing becasue in this case otter could not be washed out.
Second, the article avers that they found other otter specious like seals and sea lions decreased. So, pollutions was considered the casuse of the sea otter dead. However, the professor questions this idea by explaining that wheels disappered dut to the hunting. So, Orcaes started to eat the small fish like seals and sea lions. As a result, their ratio in the sea started to decline.
Finally, contrary to the belief in the reading passage that the polluition was the cause of unequall amount of sea otter declined. the professor argues this idea by pointing out that predition not the pollution was the cause behind that. the location accessability for orca or not was the cause of that. The area that orca can access easy the number of the sea otter decrease but, there were places that orca could not reach. So, the number of otter did not decline.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... unequall amount of sea otter declined. the professor argues this idea by pointing ...
^^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...he pollution was the cause behind that. the location accessability for orca or not ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, moreover, second, so, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79166666667 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44095552784 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4771943427 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.875 110.228320801 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377472257367 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12777610223 0.0996497079465 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607079978563 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242630166462 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127286770905 0.0443174109184 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.3589403974 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.91 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.