tpo 11

Essay topics:

tpo 11

The passage states that people are reading less literature, novels, plays, and poems that they use and it has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for culture in general, and for the future of literature itself. The professor, nevertheless, argues that it is not correct and disproves each of the reasons.

First, the article posits that nothing else provides the clever stimulation that literature does and thus by reading less literature, the reading public is missing. Conversely, the professor opposes this point by saying that there are another sources that are high quality and stimulate imagination enough.

In addition, the reading claims that instead of sitting down with a novel, people are likely to turn on the TV, watch a music video and etc that leads to lowering the level of culture in general. On the other hand, the professor argues that there are many movies that have profound effect on culture and they are good activities. According to the professor, by watching these movies the culture will be changed property.

Finally, the passage expresses that there are many talented writers today, but there is not enough support for them because the publishers try to invent less. Quite on the contrary, the lecturer emphasizes that the problem is the writer's fault. We also learn that writer's passage is difficult to understand and thus publishers have no tendency to publish it.

Therefore, the lecturer argues with all reasons that we discussed above.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in general, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1867219917 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54093058372 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560165975104 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3199826395 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.636363636 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4545454545 7.06452816374 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404561157851 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123755165408 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143205928691 0.0662205650399 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190395924481 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120345447337 0.0443174109184 272% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.