The professor states that the people, by a decline in a reading of literature book, are not having benefit from literature book and provides three reasons for support. The listening, however, says that people are having a benefit and refutes each of the professor choices.
The reading claims that there is a decrease in intellectual intelligence, imagination power due to decrease in a reading of literature. In contrast, the lecture says that despite decrease in reading of literature book, people, today, read highly written various historical, science, and fictional book. Further, she says that this book provides same intellectual and imaginative power as literature and playbook.
Second, the professor posits that it have deteriorated our culture. however, the cultural representation through music, movie also plays a vital role in uplift of culture. According the professor, this cultural representation express directly and explicitly than literature.
Third, the reading claims that today's people are not reading literature when they are given an opportunity to read a literature. The lecture negates this point by saying that today's new writer have an attitude that is difficult to understand. We also learned that today's writer will not be supportive in past day's as in present day's.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...futes each of the professor choices. The reading claims that there is a decrease...
^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... that it have deteriorated our culture. however, the cultural representation through mu...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...ult to understand. We also learned that todays writer will not be supportive in past d...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 201.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50248756219 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94864168054 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542288557214 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9893112248 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.545454545 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.06452816374 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370594999484 0.272083759551 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136774567942 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121646207597 0.0662205650399 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215930675095 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092382391338 0.0443174109184 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.