The author says that the modern people are wasting time over other things and not reading intellectual novel and plays and poems etc and he provides three justifications for his belief. However, the lecturer refutes his notion for the following reasons.
First, the author tells that the reduction in interest of the readers in books like literature is sad as these books are helpful in expanding imagination and comprehension of language. But the speaker contraindicates this point by mentioning that there are other stuff to read such as science books, history and political science which are equally intelligent and provides intellectual stimulation as literature is. Hence, the reader is not missing anything by not reading literature as suggested by the author.
Second, the passage states that the other sources of entertainment like TV, music video have declined the standard of culture. Conversely, the professor opposes this point and explains that today some of the TV programs are good and does not lower the standard of culture. In addition to it, some of the music videos today are brilliant and thus listener prefers these sources of entertainment. On the other hand, there are few novels that are very intricate to understand even for the readers in the olden time and so the people do not like to read them.
Third, the author says that the decrease number of readers are discouraging the publishers to to invest in the literature and thus only few serious writers are being supported. The have high culture values a
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...oses this point and explains that today some of the TV programs are good and does not lower...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...standard of culture. In addition to it, some of the music videos today are brilliant and th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...readers are discouraging the publishers to to invest in the literature and thus only ...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'conversely', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'thus', 'in addition', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.271062271062 0.261695866417 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.161172161172 0.158904122519 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0805860805861 0.0723426182421 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0512820512821 0.0435111971325 118% => OK
Pronouns: 0.018315018315 0.0277247811725 66% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128205128205 0.128828473217 100% => OK
Participles: 0.040293040293 0.0370669169778 109% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.75726193884 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.021978021978 0.0208969081088 105% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.124542124542 0.128158765124 97% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00732600732601 0.0114777025283 64% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1540.0 1645.83664459 94% => OK
No of words: 253.0 271.125827815 93% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08695652174 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.355731225296 0.374372842146 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.280632411067 0.287516216867 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.181818181818 0.187439937562 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.114624505929 0.113142543107 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75726193884 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541501976285 0.539623497131 100% => OK
Word variations: 52.6334068809 53.8517498576 98% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.7502111507 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0406311227 49.3711431718 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 132.220823453 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 21.7502111507 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.18181818182 0.878197800319 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 51.0632411067 50.5018328374 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.90476190476 1.90840788429 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.626646884824 0.549887131256 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.175116464383 0.142949733639 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0970247923231 0.0787303798458 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.666591204904 0.631733273073 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.141828153657 0.139662658121 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.307919537284 0.266732575781 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904833390012 0.103435571967 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.422408315574 0.414875509568 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.099533508614 0.0530846634433 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.437378993926 0.40443939384 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087915730863 0.0528353158467 166% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.