The reading and the lecture are about famous novelist portray, Jane Austen who do not have many records of her look. The reading mentioned that the painting was belonged to her by her families. However, the lecturer refutes the statement in the reading. He thinks it would be her extended family portrait.
Firstly, the reading states that her family confirmed the depict. In the contrary, the speaker refuses the reading passage and he thinks her families had not seen her because she had died seventy years before the endorsement from her family.
Second, the reading claims that her face was similar to Jane Austen but the lecturer disagrees with the passage due to the fact that she had died earlier than the time was portrayed and he suggests that it resembles her teenage niece.
Third, The article mentions that the painter who draws her picture was Azias Humphrey. When she was a teenage girl, he painted her picture. On the other hand, the lecturer believes that the style, date, and stamp behind the black canvas belongs to Wiliam Regt. In addition, she was twenty-seven years old at the time it was sold.
In conclusion, the lecturer does not agree with the reading statement and completely support her reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...eading states that her family confirmed the depict. In the contrary, the speaker refuses t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, look, second, so, third, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 208.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9375 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32560654905 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The sentence length is short
Sentence length SD: 52.9661186252 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5833333333 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267677441518 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106290179462 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773125237972 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152664242689 0.162205337803 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875240114324 0.0443174109184 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.