The article states that the portrait of a teenage girl is believe to be Jane Austen and provides three reasons of support. conversely, the porfessor states that the evidences that a teenage protriat was Jane Auston was inconvincing and hardly to prove. He refutes eaches of the author's reasons.
First, the reading avers that Auston's family has endorsed the claim that the girl in the portrait is Jane. The professor refutes this point by stating this endorsement is questionable. for the reason that no one have seen her during this age, because after the 70 years of her death, a member of her family made that claim
Second, the article claims that the face nearly similar to the one in Casandra' sketch. She is a Jane' sister which depict Jane face when she was adult. On the other hand, the professor explains that this teenage could be on of Jane's relative. Since she had a large extending family, so one of her female cousine or children depict her in the portrait. He also adds that some expert suggests it could be a girl named Marry depict, Jane distanr neice, that in the portrait.
Third, the reading posits that the style of the painting links to Ozias Humphery, who was acttive during the period when Jane was young. The professor opposes this point by telling us about the date of stamp behind the portrait. He also mentions the black canvas, that the painter used to pirtrait the teenage girl, was belong to william lake. During that time of the stamp, he was not sale canvas in London, however, after 27 years. by that time Jane was too old and clearly much older than the girl in the portrait
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
... that the portrait of a teenage girl is believe to be Jane Austen and provides three re...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Conversely
... and provides three reasons of support. conversely, the porfessor states that the evidence...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ating this endorsement is questionable. for the reason that no one have seen her du...
^^^
Line 8, column 321, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
... used to pirtrait the teenage girl, was belong to william lake. During that time of th...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 435, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
...vas in London, however, after 27 years. by that time Jane was too old and clearly ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, however, second, so, third, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64459930314 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21738064905 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529616724739 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6799978149 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8666666667 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369862459604 0.272083759551 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117262981215 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076423446957 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209937619578 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260583821952 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.2367328918 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.