The reading and the listening are both about whether the portrait of a teenage girl resembles Jane Austin. The author believes that there are good reasons to believe that the young girl depicted in painting is Jane Austin in her adolescence. However, the professor casts doubts on the claims presented by the author. The professor states that the author's proposition is based on several unconscionable assumptions and asserting that the painting owned by a member of the Austen family as that of Jane Austin is purely injudicious.
To begin with, the author claims that several decades after Austen's death, her family gave permission to portray her in letters. He notes that Austen's family members have correctly recognized that the painting best depicts the author in her young age. The point is challenged by the professor. He states that it was 70 years past Austin's death that the family came to that decision. Furthermore, she points out that no family member at that time actually saw her, and recognizing her young portrait is not at all sensible.
In addition, the author contends that the full-length portrait of the author is similar to the amateur sketch made by the author's sister Cassandra. He argues that the sketch communicates definite details about author's face. However, the professor rebuts this point. He suggests that Austin's family was quite large, and that the painting could resemble any of her cousins and other teenagers in the family. Moreover, she notes that the portrait could depict Marie, the distant niece of Austin.
Finally, the author mentions about painter Ozais Humphrey who may have drawn that portrait when Austin was young, and that the artist was active during the same period. On the other hand, the professor explains that later in time after scrutinizing the painting the stamp confirmed that it was drawn by the artist named William Leg and that the painting was drawn in black canvas. The professor adds to his explanation the fact that at the time Jane was 27 years old, black canvas weren't sold in the market.
In conclusion, the professor effectively refutes each of the claims and theories presented in the passage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 482, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...ime Jane was 27 years old, black canvas werent sold in the market. In conclusion, t...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'finally', 'furthermore', 'however', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'to begin with', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.274809160305 0.261695866417 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.157760814249 0.158904122519 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0610687022901 0.0723426182421 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.030534351145 0.0435111971325 70% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0407124681934 0.0277247811725 147% => OK
Prepositions: 0.147582697201 0.128828473217 115% => OK
Participles: 0.0432569974555 0.0370669169778 117% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.5099739313 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0152671755725 0.0208969081088 73% => OK
Particles: 0.00254452926209 0.00154638098197 165% => OK
Determiners: 0.142493638677 0.128158765124 111% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00763358778626 0.0158828679856 48% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00763358778626 0.0114777025283 67% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2177.0 1645.83664459 132% => OK
No of words: 360.0 271.125827815 133% => OK
Chars per words: 6.04722222222 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.04852973271 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.386111111111 0.374372842146 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.266666666667 0.287516216867 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.175 0.187439937562 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.1 0.113142543107 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5099739313 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486111111111 0.539623497131 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.9181843778 53.8517498576 95% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0529801325 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.7502111507 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1805044483 49.3711431718 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.944444444 132.220823453 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.7502111507 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.878197800319 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 46.6666666667 50.5018328374 92% => OK
Elegance: 2.03333333333 1.90840788429 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.702539096432 0.549887131256 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.144329827555 0.142949733639 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0902952143437 0.0787303798458 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.645379980451 0.631733273073 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.164519920165 0.139662658121 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.34574141574 0.266732575781 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12393223083 0.103435571967 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.503113845553 0.414875509568 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0698537535406 0.0530846634433 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.51465453214 0.40443939384 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105274628347 0.0528353158467 199% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.26048565121 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 3.1766004415 220% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 10.2958057395 165% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.