Reading and the lecture conflict about if a recently found portrait belong to Jane Austen or not. Reading expresses there evidences to establish the Austen is the picture in the portrait but professor refutes all these and argues against them.
First, author says that all Austen' family claim and insist that teenager in the portrait is Austen. In the lecture professor says Austen's family don't see Austen because she was dead 70 years ago so their claim isn't acceptable.
Second, reading claims that all face organs such as noise, eyebrow and overall shape of faces are similar to a sketch of adult Austen, drawing by her sister Cassandra. In the lecture professor disagrees and says Austen had an extended family with a greet number of teenager girls which this portrait may be relevant to one of them.
Finally, reading claims the style of full-long portrait is the style which a society portrait painter named Humphrey used and when Austen was teenager, Humphrey had been hiring by Austen family. Professor says the stamp which the painter used was dated back to a duration when Jane was not a teenager but an adult. Professor expresses that person who sold that stamp didn't sell in the London until Austen became 27 years old.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e lecture professor says Austens family dont see Austen because she was dead 70 year...
^^^^
Line 2, column 210, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...he was dead 70 years ago so their claim isnt acceptable. Second, reading claims tha...
^^^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...says Austen had an extended family with a greet number of teenager girls which this por...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 368, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...presses that person who sold that stamp didnt sell in the London until Austen became ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndon until Austen became 27 years old.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, second, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 210.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89047619048 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24501968336 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.777389275 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.111111111 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.526748385701 0.272083759551 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.240496666012 0.0996497079465 241% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895303680626 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.336340392508 0.162205337803 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050176004978 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.