The article states that private collectors have been selling and buying fossils especially of dinosaurs and other organisms and point out its negative consequences. However, Prof explains that he is against the Authors and refutes each of the reasons.
First, the reading claims that fossils are sold to the private collectors who do not allow them to see. The Prof refutes the points by saying the commercial fossils trade will make fossils to available in low label price. He states that small public institutions like public school and library can easily buy at affordable price so that everybody get a chance to see.
Secondly, the articles posits that scientist will miss important fossils. However, Prof says that it is impossible to claim that fossils without any scientific proof. According to the prof, fossils are distributed to others only after the experiment so there is rare chance of missing.
third, the reading says that commercial fossil trade will destroy evidence. The prof opposes this point by explaining that commercial will get many fossils which are not develop by the scientist. Furthermore, scientist will get a chance to explore many new fossils.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Third
... so there is rare chance of missing. third, the reading says that commercial fossi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'developed'.
Suggestion: developed
...ial will get many fossils which are not develop by the scientist. Furthermore, scientis...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.240384615385 0.261695866417 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.192307692308 0.158904122519 121% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100961538462 0.0723426182421 140% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0432692307692 0.0435111971325 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0240384615385 0.0277247811725 87% => OK
Prepositions: 0.100961538462 0.128828473217 78% => OK
Participles: 0.0480769230769 0.0370669169778 130% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.5941335906 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0384615384615 0.0208969081088 184% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00480769230769 0.00154638098197 311% => OK
Determiners: 0.100961538462 0.128158765124 79% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0288461538462 0.0158828679856 182% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00961538461538 0.0114777025283 84% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1182.0 1645.83664459 72% => OK
No of words: 190.0 271.125827815 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.22105263158 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 4.04852973271 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.410526315789 0.374372842146 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.305263157895 0.287516216867 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.184210526316 0.187439937562 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.136842105263 0.113142543107 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5941335906 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589473684211 0.539623497131 109% => OK
Word variations: 54.6722807619 53.8517498576 102% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 17.2727272727 21.7502111507 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9170943753 49.3711431718 59% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.454545455 132.220823453 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 21.7502111507 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.818181818182 0.878197800319 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 47.7990430622 50.5018328374 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.5 1.90840788429 79% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.601866155119 0.549887131256 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120374399396 0.142949733639 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0685823805727 0.0787303798458 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.613830594169 0.631733273073 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.105654839049 0.139662658121 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.269931993813 0.266732575781 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113123083571 0.103435571967 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.340260040683 0.414875509568 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0494453123875 0.0530846634433 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.409020588512 0.40443939384 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07934130839 0.0528353158467 150% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.