The passage states that the Salvage logging is beneficial for both that is damaged forest and to economy and he provides three hypotheses to prove his point. However, the speaker is not in favor of this notion and contraindicates his theories by providing following reasons.
First, the author tells that dead trees occupy space and thus it hinders the growth of other fresh trees in that area. Conversely, the professor opposes his point and explains that it is not true as the cleaning of dead trees is indeed harmful for the growth of fresh trees as they provide vital nutrients on decomposition. The natural way of cleaning provides time to the soil to get replenish with necessary nutrients that are essential for the better growth of all the plants.
Second, the passage says that the dead trees provides habitat to the insect such as spruce bark beetle that are lethal for other trees. The speaker refutes this point and argues that these insects have lived in forest over hundred years without causing any damage to it. In addition, these dead trees also give habitat to other insects and birds that are important for the forest in long run.
Third, in the last professor rebuts the statement made in the passage that this process is more beneficial for the economy of the industries and gives job opportunity to the local people. He reveals that in reality it is more expensive as they use helicopters and heavy vehicles which are very expensive. Moreover, the company hires trained workers from outside to do this job. Thus, it is not a permanent and good job opportunity for the local people as suggested by the passage.
‘
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 7, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le as suggested by the passage. '
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'conversely', 'first', 'however', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'thus', 'in addition', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243421052632 0.261695866417 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.148026315789 0.158904122519 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.108552631579 0.0723426182421 150% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0460526315789 0.0435111971325 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0394736842105 0.0277247811725 142% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134868421053 0.128828473217 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0263157894737 0.0370669169778 71% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.43997400915 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0296052631579 0.0208969081088 142% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.118421052632 0.128158765124 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0164473684211 0.0114777025283 143% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1651.0 1645.83664459 100% => OK
No of words: 282.0 271.125827815 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85460992908 6.08160592843 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.340425531915 0.374372842146 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.251773049645 0.287516216867 88% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.13475177305 0.187439937562 72% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0957446808511 0.113142543107 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43997400915 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.539623497131 99% => OK
Word variations: 53.1948871435 53.8517498576 99% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.6923076923 21.7502111507 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2144797768 49.3711431718 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 132.220823453 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 21.7502111507 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.923076923077 0.878197800319 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 46.8696126568 50.5018328374 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.7323943662 1.90840788429 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.682637290961 0.549887131256 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.142622002234 0.142949733639 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.098855625133 0.0787303798458 126% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.649834357064 0.631733273073 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.136234699569 0.139662658121 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.304818813273 0.266732575781 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135129296691 0.103435571967 131% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.399620006359 0.414875509568 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0290275926318 0.0530846634433 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.492131482818 0.40443939384 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317827208223 0.0528353158467 60% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.